Skill UI

Implements robust content policy compliance for generative AI prompts and outputs, such as those from Kling AI. This skill provides pre-submission filtering functionality, preventing the generation of restricted content (e.g., violence, explicit material, hate speech) and saving API credits. It includes Python code examples for prompt screening and handling server-side rejection messages.

This tool systematically designs and plans ablation studies crucial for advanced research paper submissions. It simulates the role of a rigorous ML reviewer, guiding the process of isolating the specific contributions of each novel component, testing hyperparameter sensitivities, and addressing potential reviewer questions. The workflow ensures that every experiment has a clear hypothesis, maximizing the scientific impact of the research results.

This skill is designed to facilitate communication and collaboration between different AI agents. Use it when you need to consult an expert agent, request a plan, seek a review, or continue a context-aware conversation with a specialized agent. It handles both real-time foreground chat and asynchronous background task submission, ensuring robust multi-agent workflows.

A comprehensive studio workflow for generating professional, multilingual dubbing for local audio and video assets. This skill manages the entire process, including media submission, complex localization parameters (target locale, accent, language), real-time status polling, and final artifact download. It handles critical considerations like copyright checks, speaker consent, and preview generation to ensure high-quality, contextually appropriate dubbing across diverse languages.

Guides users through the entire end-to-end process of running the GAIA benchmark. It covers environment validation, cost estimation, model execution, and generating a signed, HAL-compatible submission package for leaderboards. This ensures high integrity and reproducibility for model performance evaluation.

This skill provides authors with a comprehensive guide to positioning their computer science manuscript for the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES). It covers critical aspects such as framing the contribution, meeting evidence standards, addressing social impacts, and distinguishing the work from similar venues like FAccT. Use it to refine submissions focused on AI ethics, governance, and socio-technical methods.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with best practices for preparing supplementary artifacts for AAAI submissions. It outlines how to structure technical appendices, package reproducible code and data ZIPs, maintain strict anonymity (by removing author metadata and paths), and maximize the evidence for reproducibility. The goal is to ensure that external reviewers can easily verify the research claims without specialized or private tools.

A comprehensive guide for positioning AI/ML manuscripts for top-tier general AI conferences like AAAI. It helps authors refine their scope, frame their contribution, provide necessary evidence (e.g., ablations, baselines), and strategically compare their work against related research and similar venues (ICML, IJCAI). Ideal for pre-submission manuscript refinement.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP). It helps authors strategically frame, position, and strengthen the evidence of manuscripts focused on crowdsourcing, human-AI collaboration, and collective intelligence, ensuring the work meets the specific academic bar of the venue.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for designing, auditing, and documenting empirical evidence for high-level AI research submissions (e.g., AAAI). It covers essential methodologies including strong baselines, single-factor ablations, robustness testing (shift, seed, prompt), statistical significance, and ensuring perfect alignment with reproducibility checklists and ethical reporting. Use this guide before submission to ensure empirical evidence strongly supports all claimed AI contributions.

This guide provides comprehensive strategies for writing the Related Work section for submissions to AAAI. It teaches authors how to robustly position their paper's novelty by distinguishing contributions from both established archival literature and contemporaneous non-archival work (like arXiv papers). It also addresses specific reviewer expectations across various AI subfields (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR) and outlines clear structural templates for maximum impact.

A comprehensive guide detailing the multi-phase review structure of the AAAI conference. It advises authors on navigating the two-phase review process, mitigating Phase 1 rejection risks, structuring effective rebuttals, and understanding decision mapping across pre-submission, discussion, and final decision stages.