Skill UI

Provides a structured guide for positioning academic manuscripts within ongoing theoretical debates. It teaches authors how to move beyond simple 'gap-spotting' by identifying tensions, challenging assumptions (problematization), or testing boundaries between established theories. Essential for improving the theoretical rigor and argumentation of submissions to top-tier management journals.

This skill acts as an orchestrator for interdisciplinary academic essays, guiding users through the entire writing lifecycle of a Critical Inquiry (CI) piece. It diagnoses the project stage, determines the appropriate format (Article, Critical Response, Review), and ensures the core argument is centered on a strong, interdisciplinary theoretical intervention, preventing content drift and structural gaps.

This guide assists researchers in constructing robust theoretical arguments for entrepreneurship manuscripts, specifically focusing on the needs of ETP submissions. It details selecting core entrepreneurial mechanisms (e.g., effectuation, opportunity, bricolage), choosing appropriate theorizing modes (deductive, inductive), and ensuring the theory maintains a strong, specific link to actionable entrepreneurial practice.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to technical reviews and revising conference papers during a limited, combined rebuttal window. It teaches how to strategically triage objections, run decisive experiments, craft arguments for a program committee champion, and ensure minimal, faithful revisions to maximize acceptance chances.

A comprehensive skill for constructing robust theoretical arguments for entrepreneurial phenomena, specifically tailored for high-level academic journals. It guides the user in identifying the core causal mechanism, selecting the appropriate multidisciplinary lens (economics, psychology, or sociology), and choosing between deductive hypothesis testing or interpretive narrative theory. This ensures the theory is specific to the entrepreneurial context, avoiding generic organizational models.

A guide for structuring and articulating the theoretical contribution of International Business (IB) research, particularly for high-impact journals. It helps researchers move beyond merely descriptive findings by establishing non-incremental, cross-border insights, defining theoretical moves (e.g., qualifying or overturning established theory), and integrating societal or policy implications into the core argument.

This guide teaches scholars how to strategically position their research paper within the ongoing international business (IB) academic conversation. Instead of merely identifying a research gap, it instructs users to problematize core assumptions, join established academic debates, and structure their arguments to demonstrate clear intellectual intervention. Essential for refining paper introductions before submission to top-tier journals.

A comprehensive guide for building robust, testable theoretical frameworks for submissions to the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR). It distinguishes between deriving behavioral mechanisms (mediators, processes) and specifying structural/econometric primitives and identification arguments, ensuring the research contribution meets academic rigor.

A comprehensive guide for authors aiming to submit academic manuscripts to the Journal of Business Economics. It details the journal's specific scope, including business circulation, corporate management, and digital economy, and provides critical advice on structure, methodology, and academic framing. Use this tool to check manuscript suitability, revise arguments, identify common rejection pitfalls, and ensure adherence to the latest official submission standards.

This guide is a comprehensive tool for assessing the suitability of academic manuscripts for high-impact journals like Organization Science. It details the journal's scope, methodological expectations (including computational, qualitative, and experimental rigor), and the requirement for a clear, cross-disciplinary theoretical contribution. It helps authors refine their work, re-frame their arguments, and select the optimal academic venue before submission.

Guides the rigorous development of theoretical models and research frameworks for Production and Operations Management (POM) manuscripts. It covers analytical, empirical, and behavioral tracks, ensuring that all assumptions and mechanisms are deeply grounded in real-world operational constraints and decision-making processes, thereby building a defensible academic argument.