Skill UI

This guide details the mandatory steps for preparing the final, camera-ready version of an ASE conference paper. It covers systematic de-anonymization (restoring real author details, tools, and grants), utilizing the extra content page for incorporating review feedback, finalizing permanent DOI-archived data availability statements, and ensuring strict adherence to mandated dual IEEE/ACM templates and metadata requirements.

This guide outlines the strict rules for dividing a research paper into the main body and supplementary materials (artifact/appendices), particularly for database systems conferences like EDBT. It emphasizes that all decision-critical evidence must be presented within the reviewed pages, ensuring reviewers can judge the work without needing to open external files. It covers page budget discipline, reproducibility standards, and practical partitioning techniques.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to technical reviews and revising conference papers during a limited, combined rebuttal window. It teaches how to strategically triage objections, run decisive experiments, craft arguments for a program committee champion, and ensure minimal, faithful revisions to maximize acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide for structuring Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) conference submissions. It outlines the critical distinction between core, decision-making content (which must remain in the 8-page body) and supplementary materials (e.g., extended tables, instruments, codebooks). Special emphasis is placed on treating the video figure as a primary artifact, ensuring it is short, legible, and properly anonymized for double-blind review.

A comprehensive project management skill designed for authors planning submissions to major AI conferences (like IJCAI). This guide outlines the critical milestones, dependencies, and risk checkpoints, guiding the team from initial venue fit through abstract registration, full-paper upload, review responses, and final presentation artifact release. It ensures all deadlines and author requirements are met to maximize acceptance chances.

This comprehensive guide provides a strategic framework for drafting author responses in academic conference review cycles (e.g., NAACL ARR). It teaches authors how to prioritize reviewer objections based on their downstream impact, structure evidence using coordinates, maintain professional tone, and craft a defensible "frozen record" for the final committee review, maximizing acceptance chances.