Skill UI

This tool allows users to fine-tune the evaluation system for specific brands. Users can set minimum quality thresholds for various dimensions (e.g., brand voice, hallucination risk), adjust dimension weights based on strategic priorities, and configure auto-reject rules. It provides a comprehensive way to make content scoring criteria explicit and adjustable.

This comprehensive tool runs content through six critical scoring dimensions: content quality, brand voice, hallucination risk, claim verification, output structure, and readability. It generates a composite score, flags specific issues with actionable fix suggestions, and ensures compliance against defined brand guidelines. Essential for pre-publication reviews, client sign-offs, and continuous quality tracking.

Centralizes and structures Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that apply across all clients and brands. Use this tool to define critical workflows such as content approval processes, campaign launch checklists, quality assurance gates, and crisis escalation protocols, ensuring consistent operational standards across the entire agency portfolio.

This tool allows users to define and import custom templates for various marketing deliverables, such as proposals, performance reports, content briefs, and campaign plans. By establishing a structured template, the system ensures that all generated outputs adhere to the brand's specific formatting rules, section requirements, and content formats, making the output consistent and professional across different campaigns.

Performs comprehensive audits on multilingual content to ensure parity, technical SEO compliance, and regional accuracy. It checks for missing translations, structural deviations, correct hreflang implementation, and adherence to global regulatory requirements (e.g., GDPR, DPDPA). Essential for global brands needing consistent user experience and high search visibility across multiple markets.

A comprehensive scoring tool that evaluates translated or localized content against multiple dimensions. It combines technical checks (length ratio, formatting, key term consistency) with high-level content quality, brand voice adherence, and market-specific compliance verification. Use it to validate content readiness before publication, ensuring the material is ready for the target market and maintains brand integrity.

A comprehensive tool for publishing fully optimized blog content to major CMS platforms like WordPress or Webflow. It enforces multiple quality gates, including SEO optimization, brand voice alignment, content scoring, and compliance checks, ensuring drafts are ready for live deployment with scheduling and metadata.

This skill allows users to manage and switch between different active brand profiles within a multi-client or agency environment. It is essential for maintaining context accuracy across diverse workflows. Users can list all available brands, switch the active profile using a unique brand slug, and review key brand attributes. It ensures that all subsequent generated content adheres to the correct brand's voice, compliance rules, and business context.

This skill performs a comprehensive end-to-end validation of a brand profile, checking required fields, voice completeness, compliance status, and the live reachability of all connected services (e.g., APIs, CRMs). It acts as a critical 'production gatekeeper,' ensuring the brand setup is robust and ready for high-stakes content generation. Crucially, it verifies connectivity and status without ever exposing sensitive credential values.

This guide details the mandatory steps for preparing the final, camera-ready version of an ASE conference paper. It covers systematic de-anonymization (restoring real author details, tools, and grants), utilizing the extra content page for incorporating review feedback, finalizing permanent DOI-archived data availability statements, and ensuring strict adherence to mandated dual IEEE/ACM templates and metadata requirements.

This skill acts as an orchestrator for interdisciplinary academic essays, guiding users through the entire writing lifecycle of a Critical Inquiry (CI) piece. It diagnoses the project stage, determines the appropriate format (Article, Critical Response, Review), and ensures the core argument is centered on a strong, interdisciplinary theoretical intervention, preventing content drift and structural gaps.

A comprehensive guide for structuring Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) conference submissions. It outlines the critical distinction between core, decision-making content (which must remain in the 8-page body) and supplementary materials (e.g., extended tables, instruments, codebooks). Special emphasis is placed on treating the video figure as a primary artifact, ensuring it is short, legible, and properly anonymized for double-blind review.