Skill UI

Hard screening skill runs deterministic VC analyses where Claude gathers context, Python scores/formats, and the pipeline produces auditable verdicts with investment thesis guidance.

Guides analysts through soft-mode startup screening by extracting company profiles, scoring eight VC dimensions, applying four investor lenses, and delivering a PASS/DECLINE verdict with a concise memo.

Assess patent novelty and non-obviousness against prior art. Extracts claim elements, runs anticipation and obviousness analysis, includes cross-model examiner verification and jurisdiction-specific (USPTO/CNIPA/EPO) patentability verdicts.

This skill performs a numerate-skeptic interrogation of any plan involving financial commitments. It evaluates unit economics, runway, dilution, and capital allocation through six critical CFO questions. Suitable for hiring waves, fundraising decisions, or new budget channels. It outputs a structured verdict (Green/Yellow/Red) based on burn rate, LTV/CAC, and survival scenarios.

This skill provides a General Counsel lens for reviewing contracts, term sheets, and IP agreements. It surfaces six critical questions regarding ownership, liability, data, termination, regulatory exposure, and employment law before signing. It helps identify top risks requiring outside counsel review and generates a structured verdict on whether to sign, negotiate, or reject.

This skill provides deep, decision-grade research dossiers on any specific entity (company, person, or organization). Unlike generic profiles, it mandates the user to state a clear hypothesis upfront. The resulting dossier rigorously tests this hypothesis, providing a conclusive verdict, detailed activity timelines, network signals, red flags, and a source-provenance audit log. Ideal for due diligence, investment analysis, or high-stakes meeting preparation.

This advanced skill provides comprehensive patent prior-art and landscape intelligence. Instead of generic searches, it forces the user to commit to one of five specialized sub-use-cases: Novelty Search, Freedom-to-Operate (FTO), Competitive Landscape, Acquisition Diligence, or Litigation Prior-Art. It searches multiple global databases (Google Patents, Espacenet, USPTO) and outputs a detailed, actionable DOCX report with strategic recommendations, risk assessments, and technical verdicts.

This skill helps Heads of Commercial and RevOps analyze direct vs. partner-led channel economics. It computes fully-loaded cost-to-serve, evaluates ROI through cash, LTV, and marginal lenses, and optimizes channel mix under strategic constraints. Outputs actionable verdicts like DOUBLE-DOWN or EXIT. Ideal for quarterly reviews where profitability is unclear due to hidden costs like support load and overhead allocation.

This skill systematically analyzes Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) clause by clause, identifying unusual terms, one-sided provisions, and key negotiation points. It provides a plain English verdict and a structured risk assessment, helping users understand the legal implications before signing or countering a confidentiality agreement. Note: This is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Use this skill to pressure-test and de-risk a business or creative idea before committing time and capital. It simulates an adversarial panel of five independent experts—The Critic, The Champion, The Analyst, The Investigator, and The Customer—to attack, support, and validate your concept from every possible angle. The final Judge provides a decisive GO/RESHAPE/KILL verdict.

A dedicated canvas for reviewing plans and visual artifacts. It facilitates a tight review loop where human users can annotate specific elements, chat, and provide explicit verdicts (Approve/Request Changes) directly in a local browser environment. This tool is ideal for getting detailed, actionable feedback on designs, reports, or complex plans, moving beyond simple text confirmations.

This skill acts as an orchestrator for interdisciplinary academic essays, guiding users through the entire writing lifecycle of a Critical Inquiry (CI) piece. It diagnoses the project stage, determines the appropriate format (Article, Critical Response, Review), and ensures the core argument is centered on a strong, interdisciplinary theoretical intervention, preventing content drift and structural gaps.