Skill UI

This skill helps researchers evaluate whether their manuscript aligns with the scope and practical orientation of specific academic journals. It provides structural advice, outlines key evidence requirements (e.g., patent quality, data analysis), identifies common rejection pitfalls, and guides the user through official submission checks for highly specialized journals.

A comprehensive guide detailing the mandatory steps for converting an accepted, double-anonymous conference paper into a final, journal-ready (camera-ready) version for academic publication. This process covers de-anonymization, completing journal metadata (DOI, ORCID, CCS), incorporating shepherd-required revisions, and ensuring permanent reproducibility.

This comprehensive guide provides methodological frameworks for designing rigorous empirical studies in strategic management. It covers defining the sample, selecting the unit of analysis, validating key measures (performance and strategic choices), and critically, implementing robust identification designs (e.g., DID, IV, Fixed Effects) to address endogeneity and establish causal claims.

This comprehensive tool assesses the suitability of a manuscript for the Strategic Management Journal (SMJ). It guides authors through critical self-checks, focusing on the necessity of a clear contribution to strategy theory, the required level of empirical rigor (e.g., handling endogeneity), and ensuring the core focus remains on firm-level strategic decisions and performance outcomes. Essential for pre-submission refinement.

This comprehensive skill guides researchers through the submission process for prestigious international finance journals, specifically *Studies of International Finance*. It evaluates the manuscript's fit, checks for necessary global financial perspectives (like currency flows, regulation, and international institutions), and provides essential checklists on formatting, structure, and common rejection pitfalls.

This command acts as a crucial product gate, forcing a deep, strategic review before any code is written. Instead of simply fulfilling the request, it guides users through three structured roles: Scope Expansion (finding the 10x vision), Hold Scope (stress-testing assumptions and failure modes), or Scope Reduction (defining the true MVP). It ensures that the developed solution solves the user's real job-to-be-done, not just the explicit feature request.

This tool generates comprehensive regulatory compliance reports specifically tailored for financial institutions operating in Japan. It adheres strictly to the guidelines set by the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA), ensuring the output is formatted correctly and delivered in Japanese (ja_JP) as mandated by Japanese regulations. Users simply provide the required compliance data and reporting period to generate official, legally compliant reports.

This guide outlines a structured, step-by-step onboarding process designed to establish trust and ensure user comfort. It systematically builds rapport, establishes administrative authority, and then guides the user to provide necessary credentials (like API keys and passwords) required to finalize the system setup. Ideal for initial user activation flows.

This methodology provides a comprehensive framework for estimating buffered numbers—such as capacity limits, timeframes, or budgets—when making commitments under uncertainty. It guides users to calculate a buffer based on both residual estimation error and the potential cost of failure (breach cost), ensuring resilience against costly underestimation in critical systems or plans.

A comprehensive methodology for diagnosing complex systems where problems are emergent across multiple components. It guides the user to map system boundaries, stocks and flows, feedback loops, and underlying structural drivers. By identifying the highest feasible leverage point, it recommends structural interventions that address root causes rather than superficial symptoms.

Turn interpretive-ambiguity audits of legal texts into polished deliverables: multi-page websites, single-page interactive sites, Word documents, PowerPoint decks, or LaTeX/PDF. Handles structured stress-test output, semi-structured reports, or raw prose, and renders consistent scenario-based legal analysis presentations.

Adversarial stress-test for legal texts (contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion) that finds ambiguous seams and turns each into a concrete dispute scenario with both sides' arguments, likely outcome, and a fix. Ideal for pressure-testing, red-teaming, auditing, or identifying loopholes and drafting problems in legal documents.