Skill UI

This tool serves as the primary orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to the American Sociological Review (ASR). It guides users through the entire publication lifecycle, determining the optimal sub-skill based on the project's current stage, manuscript type (Article or Comment/Reply), and methodological approach (e.g., quantitative, ethnographic). It helps users confirm broad sociological significance and find the next critical step in the publishing process.

This skill provides a comprehensive academic advisory guide for manuscripts targeting Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP). It helps authors re-frame their work, ensuring the focus is on advancing theoretical contributions rather than merely describing phenomena. Use this tool to check scope fit, methodological rigor, and structural requirements for top-tier entrepreneurship journals.

This guide provides comprehensive methodological frameworks for designing research studies in the field of entrepreneurship. It helps users match specific entrepreneurial theories or questions (e.g., founder cognition, financing signals) to appropriate research designs, covering qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Crucially, it details how to address endemic challenges unique to studying new ventures, such as selection bias, survivorship bias, and establishing proper temporal precedence.

This guide helps authors polish their academic prose for submission to Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP). It focuses on adjusting the narrative style to be theory-forward, highly accessible, and deeply grounded in concrete entrepreneurial realities. It provides specific structural advice for improving the introduction, transforming the abstract into a clear contribution statement, and strengthening the practice implications.

This skill is a comprehensive fit assessment tool for authors submitting applied corporate finance manuscripts to the Financial Management journal. It guides users on the journal's specific scope, required empirical rigor, ideal article structure, and common desk-reject themes. It helps authors position their work for maximum relevance to both academics and industry practitioners.

This guide provides a rigorous framework for evaluating finance research topics before writing begins. It helps authors ensure the topic is general-interest, practically relevant to decision-makers (CFOs, investors, regulators), highly topical, and genuinely original. It ensures the work meets the standards of top general-interest finance journals.

This specialized skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting the journal Industrial Economics Research. It covers the journal's positioning, preferred research topics (e.g., industrial organization, competition policy, digital transformation), required academic structure (introduction, literature review), and common pitfalls to avoid. It helps authors tailor their manuscripts to meet the high standards of CSSCI-level academic publishing.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through evaluating if their technically rigorous economics manuscript (covering theory, econometrics, or macroeconomics) is suitable for the International Economic Review (IER). It analyzes the paper's formal contribution, methodological rigor, generalizability, and adherence to high academic standards, helping authors refine their work before submission.

This guide helps authors structure and articulate the novel, rigorous contribution of their work specifically for Information Systems Research (ISR) journals. It addresses the mandatory ~500-word contribution statement required in cover letters, ensuring the paper clearly advances an IS conversation, centers the IT artifact, and matches the required academic genre (insight, mechanism, or artifact).

A comprehensive tool for sanity-checking research questions intended for Information Systems Research (ISR). It guides users to test the topic's fitness across four dimensions: IT-artifact centrality, sociotechnical framing, intradisciplinary potential, and level of analysis. It helps determine if the topic belongs in ISR or neighboring venues like MISQ or JMIS.

This guide helps researchers refine and elevate preliminary marketing findings into high-impact, publishable questions suitable for JAMS. It teaches the rigorous standards required for a question to be broad, theoretically generative, and managerially consequential, ensuring proper positioning against competing academic journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing manuscripts for top-tier academic journals, especially in finance (e.g., The Journal of Finance). It details how to anticipate potential objections from handling editors and expert referees, covering areas like identification credibility, robustness checks, and general interest framing. This tool helps optimize the paper's structure pre-submission to maximize acceptance chances.