Skill UI

Provides a comprehensive, multi-layered framework for systematic competitor tracking and market intelligence. It guides strategic decisions for CMOs, CROs, and CPOs by facilitating competitive positioning mapping, battlecard creation, win/loss analysis, and feature gap identification. Use it when needing deep market insights or strategic planning against rivals.

A comprehensive 10-page pitch deck template designed for fundraising and presenting to venture capitalists (VCs). It covers all essential sections, including problem identification, solution overview, market size (TAM/SAM/SOM), traction data visualization, business model, go-to-market strategy, and the funding ask. Ideal for startups seeking seed or Series A funding.

This guide acts as a specialized router for structuring academic manuscripts aiming for top-tier journals, such as 'Accounting Research'. It assesses the paper's fit, guides the sequence of methodological steps (e.g., measurement, identification, mechanism), and suggests addressing weaknesses like institutional context or empirical contributions. It helps users navigate the complex academic publishing journey from initial idea to final submission and rebuttal.

A router skill that determines which specialized er-* sub-skill to invoke next for manuscript workflow from topic selection to rebuttal, tailored for the CSSCI journal Economic Research Journal. It diagnoses bottlenecks and suggests the next step in the research pipeline, including topic selection, introduction, theory, identification, robustness, and rebuttal.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing manuscripts for top-tier academic journals, especially in finance (e.g., The Journal of Finance). It details how to anticipate potential objections from handling editors and expert referees, covering areas like identification credibility, robustness checks, and general interest framing. This tool helps optimize the paper's structure pre-submission to maximize acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide for building robust, testable theoretical frameworks for submissions to the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR). It distinguishes between deriving behavioral mechanisms (mediators, processes) and specifying structural/econometric primitives and identification arguments, ensuring the research contribution meets academic rigor.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through the rigorous process of assessing whether a corporate finance manuscript is suitable for the Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF) or related elite venues. It covers topic scope (governance, M&A, capital structure), methodological requirements (causal identification, endogeneity), structural best practices, and provides a detailed, step-by-step checklist for pre-submission self-review and alternative venue routing.

This comprehensive skill helps researchers determine if their academic paper, focusing on banking, liquidity, or financial intermediation, is suitable for the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI). It guides authors on necessary theoretical contributions, rigorous empirical identification methods (e.g., DiD/IV/RDD), required paper structure, and adherence to the journal's highly specific submission standards and potential rejection triggers.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting JMCB, focusing on monetary economics, banking, and macro-finance. This skill helps assess if a manuscript meets the journal's standards regarding policy relevance, empirical rigor (e.g., identification strategies like SVAR/DiD), and structural framing. It guides authors on positioning their findings against current academic frontiers.

A detailed guide for authors submitting to top-tier management journals, focusing on responding to reviewer comments (R&R). It provides a structured methodology for drafting point-by-point rebuttal letters, ensuring alignment between the revised manuscript and the written response. The guide emphasizes prioritizing text revision, strengthening identification, mechanism, and policy implications.

A comprehensive workflow router designed to guide researchers through the entire process of preparing manuscripts for top-tier business journals, such as the Nankai Business Review. This guide does not replace specialized skills but provides a structured, stage-gated approach covering theory gap identification, hypothesis development, rigorous measurement validation (e.g., SEM, validity), contextualization, and strategic revision (R&R). It ensures that the paper meets the necessary standards for theoretical contribution and empirical depth.

This comprehensive guide provides methodological frameworks for designing rigorous empirical studies in strategic management. It covers defining the sample, selecting the unit of analysis, validating key measures (performance and strategic choices), and critically, implementing robust identification designs (e.g., DID, IV, Fixed Effects) to address endogeneity and establish causal claims.