Skill UI

This workflow guides the setup of a complete two-way communication system using the Podium API. It demonstrates how to set up webhooks to automatically receive inbound messages, implement auto-reply logic, and programmatically send outbound replies. It is essential for businesses needing to unify customer messaging, manage reviews, and process payments through a single integrated channel.

This skill provides an expert framework for applying psychological principles and mental models to marketing strategy. It helps users understand deep consumer behavior, solve complex decision-making problems, and ethically influence purchasing decisions. Use it when addressing cognitive biases, persuasion techniques, or needing foundational frameworks like First Principles and Jobs to Be Done for strategic optimization.

Used to verify the actual billing reality, revenue, and pricing mechanics—such as team billing, quotas, and refunds—based on underlying product code, rather than sales documents or simple customer fixes. This skill separates billing facts, customer impact, and the true product implementation logic.

This guide acts as a specialized router for structuring academic manuscripts aiming for top-tier journals, such as 'Accounting Research'. It assesses the paper's fit, guides the sequence of methodological steps (e.g., measurement, identification, mechanism), and suggests addressing weaknesses like institutional context or empirical contributions. It helps users navigate the complex academic publishing journey from initial idea to final submission and rebuttal.

This tool serves as the primary orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to the American Sociological Review (ASR). It guides users through the entire publication lifecycle, determining the optimal sub-skill based on the project's current stage, manuscript type (Article or Comment/Reply), and methodological approach (e.g., quantitative, ethnographic). It helps users confirm broad sociological significance and find the next critical step in the publishing process.

This skill provides a comprehensive academic advisory guide for manuscripts targeting Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP). It helps authors re-frame their work, ensuring the focus is on advancing theoretical contributions rather than merely describing phenomena. Use this tool to check scope fit, methodological rigor, and structural requirements for top-tier entrepreneurship journals.

This guide provides comprehensive methodological frameworks for designing research studies in the field of entrepreneurship. It helps users match specific entrepreneurial theories or questions (e.g., founder cognition, financing signals) to appropriate research designs, covering qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Crucially, it details how to address endemic challenges unique to studying new ventures, such as selection bias, survivorship bias, and establishing proper temporal precedence.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through evaluating if their technically rigorous economics manuscript (covering theory, econometrics, or macroeconomics) is suitable for the International Economic Review (IER). It analyzes the paper's formal contribution, methodological rigor, generalizability, and adherence to high academic standards, helping authors refine their work before submission.

This guide provides a rigorous framework for designing empirical and qualitative studies in the field of entrepreneurship. It emphasizes a 'theory-first' approach, guiding researchers on how to structure designs that effectively test theoretical mechanisms while addressing common methodological challenges such as selection bias, survivorship bias, and establishing temporal precedence. Essential for manuscripts targeting top-tier journals in the field.

This skill guides researchers in refining their manuscript's core contribution for top academic journals like JCP. It teaches how to shift the narrative focus from simply reporting an 'effect' (X increases Y) to articulating the underlying psychological 'PROCESS' or 'mechanism' (X increases Y *because* it changes M). It ensures claims are theoretically surprising, scope-bound, and relevant to consumer behavior.

This framework guides researchers on how to rigorously position their academic contribution, particularly for top-tier journals like JMR. It mandates defining novelty across three critical axes—substantive phenomena, methodological models, and theoretical mechanisms—and explicitly distinguishing the work from the single closest piece of existing literature to ensure the contribution is framed as a genuine advance.

This guide helps researchers select and defend the appropriate empirical methodology for Operations Management (OM) studies. It covers diverse design types—including surveys, archival data analysis, behavioral experiments, field studies, and intervention-based research—ensuring the design is observation-grounded, matches the operational claim, and anticipates rigorous methodological checks.