Skill UI

This tool provides comprehensive competitive intelligence by scraping and analyzing data from major online platforms, including Google Maps, Booking.com, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok. It extracts structured data on competitors' content, pricing, ad strategies, review sentiment, and market positioning. Ideal for market researchers, product managers, and marketing strategists who need deep benchmarks across multiple digital channels to refine their own strategy.

A comprehensive framework for planning and executing multi-channel product launch campaigns. This skill guides users through audience research, positioning definition, content strategy (landing pages, emails, social, video), and rigorous review gates to ensure every asset drives conversion and maintains brand consistency across all platforms. Ideal for orchestrating major product releases.

This tool simulates market demand using synthetic audience panels grounded in real CRM data to estimate customers' willingness-to-pay (WTP). It calculates optimal price points, acceptable price ranges, and analyzes price sensitivity across different buyer segments. Use this command to guide pricing strategies before product launch, tier adjustments, or competitive positioning evaluation, providing actionable intelligence without expensive formal research.

This specialized skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting the journal Industrial Economics Research. It covers the journal's positioning, preferred research topics (e.g., industrial organization, competition policy, digital transformation), required academic structure (introduction, literature review), and common pitfalls to avoid. It helps authors tailor their manuscripts to meet the high standards of CSSCI-level academic publishing.

This guide helps researchers refine and elevate preliminary marketing findings into high-impact, publishable questions suitable for JAMS. It teaches the rigorous standards required for a question to be broad, theoretically generative, and managerially consequential, ensuring proper positioning against competing academic journals.

This skill guides researchers on how to position their academic paper for top-tier journals in entrepreneurship. Instead of merely identifying 'gaps,' the focus is on joining an active scholarly conversation, problematizing established assumptions, and engaging with multiple disciplinary lenses (e.g., economics, psychology, sociology). It ensures the manuscript's contribution is clearly framed against the existing literature.

This guide teaches scholars how to strategically position their research paper within the ongoing international business (IB) academic conversation. Instead of merely identifying a research gap, it instructs users to problematize core assumptions, join established academic debates, and structure their arguments to demonstrate clear intellectual intervention. Essential for refining paper introductions before submission to top-tier journals.

This framework guides researchers on how to rigorously position their academic contribution, particularly for top-tier journals like JMR. It mandates defining novelty across three critical axes—substantive phenomena, methodological models, and theoretical mechanisms—and explicitly distinguishing the work from the single closest piece of existing literature to ensure the contribution is framed as a genuine advance.

This guide provides a framework for authors to strategically position their empirical research within the ongoing academic debates of Operations and Supply Chain Management (OM/SCM). It teaches authors to move beyond merely identifying knowledge gaps by problematizing shared assumptions, explicitly distinguishing empirical observation from analytical modeling, and aligning the contribution with the target department's specific mission.

This guide instructs authors on how to strategically position their research manuscript within the established body of Operations Management (OM) literature. Instead of claiming an unstudied 'void,' the focus is on joining and advancing specific 'operational conversations' within canonical OM streams (e.g., queueing, supply chain, revenue management). It emphasizes differentiating contributions based on novel operational mechanisms or decision levers, ensuring the paper's fit is clear to expert reviewers and editors.

This guide assists researchers in determining whether a manuscript's topic, methodology, and theoretical contribution are appropriate for a specific theory-building management journal. It provides detailed criteria for evaluating conceptual relationships, suitable methods (SEM, experiment, case study), and appropriate re-routing suggestions for papers that are misaligned with the target journal's scope (e.g., pure math models, macro policy evaluation).

This skill helps researchers evaluate whether their manuscript aligns with the scope and practical orientation of specific academic journals. It provides structural advice, outlines key evidence requirements (e.g., patent quality, data analysis), identifies common rejection pitfalls, and guides the user through official submission checks for highly specialized journals.