Skill UI

This guide helps structure, audit, and refine the exhibits (tables and figures) for academic manuscripts, particularly in Human Relations. It ensures that the inference path from raw data to theoretical claims is visible. It covers best practices for both qualitative exhibits (data-structure models, evidence tables) and quantitative exhibits (regression models, interaction plots), while adhering to submission constraints like anonymization and word limits.

A comprehensive guide for generating and packaging reproducible evidence for signal processing submissions to ICASSP. It details what reviewers prioritize (scoring scripts, dataset splits, logs) and outlines best practices to ensure that headline metrics are easily regenerated, thereby maximizing review credibility and post-publication impact.

A comprehensive guide for researchers submitting signal processing papers, detailing how to achieve rigorous reproducibility for conferences like ICASSP. It emphasizes that simply providing a model is insufficient; authors must pin down the 'scoring ruler,' data versions, front-end parameters, and computational seeds to ensure every reported metric can be independently verified.

A comprehensive guide detailing the ICASSP peer review pipeline, covering single-blind review mechanics, technical committee evaluation criteria, and the strategic importance of evidence, significance, and reproducibility in signal processing papers. Use this to craft submission strategies and decode decision letters.

A comprehensive guide modeling the ICCV review pipeline, covering the entire cycle from registration to final decision (March-June). It details author responsibilities, the enforcement of reviewer accountability, the prohibition of LLM use in reviews, and strategies for authors to interpret and leverage diverse review feedback, including utilizing the 'Findings' workshop.

A comprehensive guide for positioning database research papers for top-tier conferences like ICDE. It teaches authors how to distinguish genuine novelty (new mechanisms) from engineering delta (implementation improvements), conduct deep literature audits, and compare their work against both academic venues and real-world production systems. Essential for improving manuscript eligibility and impact.

This guide outlines comprehensive standards for scientific reproducibility in data engineering. It details best practices for pinning hardware, software, datasets, and variance protocols, ensuring that all performance claims are verifiable and re-runnable by peers, making reproducibility a scored component of academic submission.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for packaging research artifacts (code, data, logs) for submission to data mining conferences like ICDM. The focus is on ensuring the artifact is completely anonymous for triple-blind review (scrubbing Git history, paths, and internal names) and maximizing reproducibility, allowing reviewers to verify results with minimal effort.

A comprehensive guide for researchers designing and auditing empirical evaluations for data mining papers (e.g., ICDM). It teaches how to structure a trustworthy evaluation by defining operational tasks, conducting ablation studies to isolate mechanisms, proving scalability, and implementing known-truth checks to ensure findings are valid and not mere artifacts.

A comprehensive guide for ensuring the reproducibility of data mining research for top-tier conferences like ICDM. It addresses the unique challenges of triple-blind review and strict page limits by detailing necessary artifacts, such as configuration files, seed lists, and anonymized packages. Learn how to achieve Rerunnable, Rebuildable, or Attested reproducibility tiers to solidify your scientific claims.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for packaging and documenting complex robotics research artifacts (code, simulations, hardware designs, datasets, etc.) for scholarly review. It outlines best practices for ensuring reproducibility, adopting the "five-minute-skeptic standard," and managing the full lifecycle of artifacts from review submission to public acceptance.

A comprehensive guide detailing the academic standards for ensuring research reproducibility at ICSE. Covers open-science policies, mandatory data availability statements, techniques for pinning provenance (especially for mining and LLMs), and best practices for maintaining verifiability while ensuring anonymity. Essential for academic submissions.