Skill UI

This guide models the rigorous, multi-cycle decision-making process for top-tier data mining conferences like KDD. It details how decisions are weighed, considering reviewer scores, rebuttal strategies, area chair synthesis, and specific criteria (e.g., reproducibility, ethics, industrial feasibility) across outcomes like Accept, Resubmit, and Reject. Essential for understanding academic publishing rigor.

A comprehensive checklist for auditing submissions to top-tier data mining conferences like KDD. This guide covers critical areas including track declaration, OpenReview profile completeness for all authors, adherence to strict page limits, double-blind anonymity rules, and quantifying post-launch performance evidence. Essential for maximizing acceptance chances.

A comprehensive style guide for revising research papers to meet the specific, high standards of KDD conferences. It details the expected structure of the first page, emphasizing data regimes, named mechanisms, and quantifiable evidence (scale, metrics). It also provides rules for differentiating research vs. applied data science (ADS) voices and optimizing content for two-column, page-limited formats.

A comprehensive guide for stress-testing the evidence supporting ML claims before submitting to top-tier academic conferences. Covers rigorous auditing of baselines, ablation studies, robustness checks, data leakage, and calibrating claims against evidence strength, ensuring scientific reproducibility.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to machine learning conferences like NeurIPS. It details the rigorous standards for data splitting, hyperparameter reporting, random-seed protocols, and compute transparency required for a main-track paper. It also helps authors strategically decide between the main track and the MLRC/TMLR routes based on their core contribution (replication vs. novelty).

A comprehensive guide to the rigorous academic peer review process, exemplified by top-tier Recommender Systems conferences (RecSys). It details the double-blind review mechanics, key evaluation criteria (novelty, validity, reproducibility), the critical rebuttal phase, and the requirements for final publication in ACM Digital Library. Essential for researchers and students aiming to improve academic submission quality.

This guide details the best practices for structuring supplementary materials for scientific conferences, ensuring the main paper remains self-contained. It covers transforming raw data, failure logs, and robotic videos into credible evidence annexes. Key areas include anonymization of media, maintaining archive hygiene, and structuring appendices to deepen belief without being mandatory for understanding the core claims.

A comprehensive guide for packaging and submitting artifacts for Information Retrieval (IR) conferences (like SIGIR). It details the strict requirements for reproducibility, including mandatory components like TREC-format run files, qrels, and index recipes. The process covers repository structure, anonymization for review, handling data provenance, and ensuring that results can be audited by any reviewer using standard community tooling.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier database conferences (like SIGMOD) on how to position their research. It covers deep-history diligence, managing concurrent work, and structuring the related-work section using contrast-form writing to establish clear novelty claims against multiple literature lines, including industrial systems and theoretical boundaries.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting visualization papers to major conferences like IEEE VIS. It outlines the strict rules for partitioning content, ensuring the core argument remains judgeable from the main body while leveraging supplemental materials (video, code, full data) to demonstrate interaction and reproducibility. Essential reading for academic researchers in the field.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for packaging and submitting research artifacts (datasets, models, code) for major conferences. It details the difference between mere 'existence' (badge verification) and true academic 'reproducibility,' covering archival strategies, web data licensing, takedown resilience, and minimal viable package structure for long-term scholarly impact.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting papers to web conferences. It details how to structure empirical claims, ensuring evidence matches the claim's scope (scale, freshness, generalizability). The guide covers avoiding methodological flaws like temporal or popularity leakage, selecting datasets with proper provenance, and performing rigorous ablations and statistical analysis for maximum academic rigor.