Skill UI

A comprehensive expert prompt for evaluating Power BI data models. It guides the assessment of model architecture (Star Schema, relationships), storage optimization (Import, DirectQuery, Dual), data quality, performance scalability, and governance best practices. Use this when reviewing an existing BI model to ensure it is robust, maintainable, and highly performant.

A comprehensive tool designed for academic literature orientation. It searches papers using free keyless APIs (PubMed and OpenAlex) and builds a structured 'launching pad' guide, rather than a finished review. It helps researchers define their scope using frameworks like PICO/SPIDER, ensuring a confident and systematic starting point for deep research in unfamiliar fields.

Guidance for designing, building, refreshing, and reviewing Power BI / Analysis Services tabular models from the terminal. Covers star schema, relationships, measures, calculation groups, roles, storage modes, incremental refresh, and model optimization. Routes every operation to the narrowest capable tool: te CLI first, then TOM or MCP, then TMDL. Ensures model quality, performance, and readiness for Copilot/AI.

A comprehensive guide for strengthening the methodological rigor of academic manuscripts, particularly for high-stakes journals. It covers advanced techniques for causal identification (e.g., Difference-in-Differences, Instrumental Variables, Regression Discontinuity), pre-analysis planning, linking theory to empirical tests, and defending claims against skeptical reviewers. This skill focuses on methodological architecture, not code.

This framework provides a rigorous methodology for conducting systematic literature reviews and comprehensive academic syntheses. It guides researchers through building transparent coverage, designing robust coding matrices, and choosing the correct integration method (narrative, systematic, or bibliometric) to move beyond simple summarization and create an auditable intellectual map of a field.

This guide assists researchers in strengthening the methodological rigor of academic work, particularly in political science. It provides structured methods for defending research design, covering rigorous causal identification for quantitative work (e.g., DiD, IV, RDD) and systematic case selection/process tracing for qualitative analysis. Use this when facing reviewer skepticism or preparing a pre-analysis plan to ensure the evidence credibly connects to the theoretical argument.

This skill audits academic literature reviews (like Annual Reviews of Psychology) to ensure they maintain scholarly rigor, balance, and objectivity. It checks for uneven coverage across different labs or theories, ensures evidence is weighted by design strength and replication status (not mere vote-counting), and flags potential self-promotion or bias. Use this when scrutinizing a high-stakes scientific review for academic fairness.

This guide provides comprehensive guidelines for selecting, validating, and defending rigorous research designs for Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) manuscripts. It covers various approaches—including panel archival, controlled experiments, analytical models, field studies, and surveys—while stressing critical rigor checks like identification strategy, internal validity, and model discipline. It also mandates adherence to ethical review processes and data integrity policies.

A detailed guide for scrutinizing statistical inference in high-level econometric manuscripts, designed to withstand rigorous technical peer review. It covers critical areas such as selecting appropriate clustering levels, handling weak instrumental variables (IV), correcting for multiple hypothesis testing, and ensuring accurate standard error reporting for panel data and causal inference models.

This skill guides the design of real-data validation for academic manuscripts, specifically for forecasting and financial engineering strands. It covers data provenance, rolling out-of-sample tests, benchmark batteries, and statistical significance of improvements. It ensures robustness against look-ahead bias and parameter sensitivity, helping authors meet rigorous external review standards for empirical studies in journals like Chinese Journal of Management Science.

A comprehensive guide to strengthening the quantitative research design for communication manuscripts. It covers best practices and methodological rigor for experiments (lab/online), panel surveys, and content analysis. Learn how to pre-register designs, control for common confounds (e.g., common-method variance), and rigorously establish causality, helping you defend your work against skeptical reviewers.

This guide provides a framework for rigorously defending the methodological design of scientific manuscripts in conservation biology. It covers advanced topics including detection modeling (occupancy, capture-recapture), addressing spatial structure and pseudoreplication, quasi-experimental designs (BACI, difference-in-differences), and systematic review protocols (PRISMA). The goal is to ensure that the evidence presented directly and credibly supports transferable, decision-relevant conservation conclusions.