Skill UI

A comprehensive checklist for auditing academic submissions to ACM Multimedia (ACM MM). Covers thematic area selection, formatting constraints (6-8 page limit), enforcing double-blind anonymity, managing OpenReview mechanics, and identifying common desk-reject triggers. Essential for authors preparing technical papers for top-tier conferences.

This guide provides an in-depth understanding of the peer-review process for Conservation Biology, covering double-blind review standards, editorial screening criteria, and expert review priorities. It teaches authors how to structure their research to explicitly demonstrate conservation relevance, novelty, and transferable implications, effectively stress-testing a manuscript against common desk-rejection grounds.

This tool provides a comprehensive guide to the manuscript review process for Demography journal. It details the double-blind review structure, the mandatory pre-review desk screening (by Editor/Deputy Editor), and the common grounds for desk rejection. By stress-testing your paper against these academic standards, authors can significantly improve their work, ensuring methodological rigor and general interest before submission.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers audit their papers before submission to the EDBT conference. It covers critical steps including selecting the correct submission cycle and paper shape (Regular, Vision, Experiments & Analysis), adhering to strict formatting standards, managing the 12-month resubmission ban, ensuring double-blind compliance, and providing verifiable, reproducible artifacts. It is essential for academic publishing compliance.

This guide outlines the rigorous quantitative standards required for publishing comparative and longitudinal studies in high-impact sociological journals. It covers essential techniques such as multilevel modeling, handling small macro-N inference, calculating marginal effects, and ensuring strict reproducibility. It teaches researchers how to design analyses that withstand expert double-blind review.

A comprehensive guide on designing self-contained, high-impact tables and figures (Exhibits) for quantitative sociological manuscripts, specifically adhering to European Sociological Review (ESR) standards. It covers best practices for presenting cross-national, longitudinal, and comparative data, emphasizing magnitude, uncertainty (e.g., forest/caterpillar plots), and strict reproducibility to ensure results stand alone for double-blind review.

A comprehensive guide for authors writing Experimental Economics manuscripts. This skill helps you anticipate and proactively address the rigorous, double-blind objections typically raised by academic referees—such as concerns over deception, statistical power, omitted confounds, or impure treatment contrasts—before submission, ensuring methodological integrity and strengthening the manuscript.

This guide models the rigorous, double-blind, and per-track evaluation process for submissions to the IPSN conference. It details how papers are judged based on the soundness of information-processing methods, the reality of collected evidence (e.g., measured energy, latency), and the novelty of sensing approaches. It also clarifies key differences from other academic venues like SenSys and OpenReview, guiding authors on what evidence is crucial for acceptance.

This guide provides best practices for preparing code, data, and supporting artifacts for academic submissions, focusing on achieving reproducibility for peer review (especially in double-blind settings). It covers crucial steps including artifact anonymization, establishing clear data availability statements, structuring the repository (README, env, data, src), ensuring licensing compliance, and planning for permanent post-acceptance archiving.

A comprehensive guide for designing and presenting rigorous experiments for top-tier computer science journals. It covers best practices for ensuring reproducibility, matching evidence to claims, selecting appropriate baselines, performing statistical significance testing, and handling modern challenges like LLM contamination and system scalability measurements. Essential for passing double-blind peer review.

This guide provides a comprehensive pre-submission preflight checklist for manuscripts targeting the Journal of International Business Studies (JIBS). It ensures authors meet all structural, formatting, and ethical requirements, including double-blind anonymization, adhering to the JIBS Style Guide, managing word counts, and complying with Data Accessibility Statement (DART) policies before submitting to the Springer Nature portal.

This comprehensive skill guides authors on submitting academic manuscripts to the Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics. It helps users determine if their work's scope, methodology, and narrative structure align with the journal's requirements. It covers everything from field preferences and formatting rules (e.g., double-blind review) to common rejection pitfalls, minimizing the risk of inappropriate submission.