Skill UI

A comprehensive skill for advanced meta-analysis in psychology, designed to assess the reliability and sources of heterogeneity. It performs moderator/subgroup analyses (meta-regression) to explain effect size variation and runs multiple publication-bias diagnostics (e.g., Funnel plot, Egger's test, p-curve, selection models). Essential for rigorous academic reporting requiring robust evidence and sensitivity checks.

A comprehensive guide for executing and reporting quantitative analyses for high-stakes public policy research. This skill emphasizes methodological rigor, demanding transparency in uncertainty reporting (effect size, intervals), robust checks (heterogeneity, alternative specifications), and ensuring full reproducibility through master scripts and pinned versions for journal submission.

This skill guides the execution and stress-testing of empirical analysis for innovation studies (Research Policy). It details how to build reproducible bibliometric and patent variables, select appropriate econometric models (like Poisson/Negative Binomial for counts), and establish robust evidence. The focus is on addressing methodological challenges, ensuring transparent variable construction, and performing rigorous sensitivity checks to withstand expert scrutiny.

This guide provides a comprehensive methodological framework for conducting and reporting rigorous robustness checks in high-stakes empirical economics papers. It details crucial steps—including specification stability, placebo tests, inference corrections, and mechanism evidence—necessary to anticipate skeptical reviewers. The goal is to harden findings, ensure reproducibility, and elevate the credibility of research findings.

This guide is designed for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, providing a rigorous framework to stress-test the robustness and completeness of reported findings. It mandates advanced checks such as saturation evidence, risk-of-bias appraisal, and statistical diagnostics (e.g., heterogeneity, publication bias) to ensure conclusions are not artifacts of omission or methodological weakness. Essential for high-level academic research.

A comprehensive guide for preparing replication and transparency packages for World Development manuscripts. It provides checklists and best practices for both quantitative (code reproducibility, data provenance, de-identification) and qualitative (evidence-to-claim trail, methods appendix) research. It addresses ethical constraints and the unique challenges of double-anonymized review.

This skill maps chronic conditions extracted from clinical notes to CMS-HCC V28 categories. It estimates the Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) score, which is crucial for Medicare Advantage payments. It serves as decision support for coders by identifying candidate HCCs, applying complex coding hierarchies, and checking for MEAT documentation evidence for human validation.

This skill audits a complete security or forensics case package to ensure its readiness for formal report handoff. It verifies scope metadata, evidence record integrity, traceability between Findings, Paths, and Evidence, and checks artifact hash consistency. It is a non-destructive, read-only review process designed to validate the defensibility and completeness of the investigation before documentation.

A powerful tool for deterministic and reproducible retrieval of evidence from specialized academic and policy corpora. It supports searching arXiv (preprints), PubMed/PMC (biomedical literature), and US policy documents. Users can check corpus freshness, retrieve stable metadata, and fetch full-document Markdown for high-reliability research tasks.