Skill UI

This tool serves as an orchestrator for authors preparing submissions to Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier). It guides users through the entire research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and theoretical formalization to study design, data analysis, and open science practices. It emphasizes structuring the contribution as a model-driven, multi-experiment program, ensuring all necessary steps, including code transparency, are addressed.

This skill acts as an academic positioning tool for targeting high-level journals focused on institutional and economic comparison, such as the Comparative Economic and Social Systems journal. It helps users assess if their manuscript possesses the necessary comparative scope, institutional logic, and generalizable theoretical contribution required for acceptance, guiding manuscript reframing and submission strategy.

A comprehensive guide helping authors position their research for the Conference on Learning Theory (COLT). It covers core topics like formal learning theory, statistical learning, optimization, and lower bounds. Use this tool to evaluate venue fit, structure the manuscript as 'theorem-first,' and adhere to specific academic conference submission standards.

This skill automatically converts structured data from Excel (.xlsx) workbooks into a clean, readable Markdown format. It is essential for enabling accurate analysis, summarization, and data extraction of spreadsheet contents, especially when the user asks to 'read', 'analyze', or 'compare' data without specifying a conversion method. It supports both single files and batch processing of entire folders.

This skill converts Microsoft Word documents (.docx) into Markdown format. It is essential for accurately analyzing, summarizing, or extracting data from proprietary Word files, as direct parsing is unreliable. It supports single files, batch processing of folders, and is designed to coordinate with sibling skills (PDF and Excel) when handling mixed document types to ensure no data is skipped.

This tool guides researchers in selecting and rigorously stress-testing appropriate methodologies (quantitative, qualitative, or normative) for public administration manuscripts. It ensures methodological alignment with the core research question, providing detailed checks for causal inference techniques (DID, IV, RDD) and qualitative rigor, thereby strengthening the overall academic argument.

This guide provides comprehensive standards for achieving auditability and transparency in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) research. It teaches researchers how to document non-shareable evidence, such as field interviews, log traces, and system deployments, by focusing on detailed analysis trails, decision logs, and rigorous process documentation, thus strengthening academic rigor.

This tool provides a comprehensive guide to the manuscript review process for Demography journal. It details the double-blind review structure, the mandatory pre-review desk screening (by Editor/Deputy Editor), and the common grounds for desk rejection. By stress-testing your paper against these academic standards, authors can significantly improve their work, ensuring methodological rigor and general interest before submission.

A comprehensive planning tool for developmental psychology researchers designing studies that must support a claim of change. It systematically guides users through critical methodological issues, including addressing age vs. cohort confounds, planning for measurement invariance across ages, handling attrition, and properly justifying sample size for growth slopes. Essential for strengthening the pre-analysis plan of longitudinal and cross-sectional designs.

This skill guides authors on submitting original, high-quality, and reusable Earth System datasets (observations, reanalysis, model outputs) as primary publications. It assesses whether the work fits the criteria of a 'data paper,' requiring open deposition in a FAIR repository with a persistent DOI, detailed provenance documentation, and rigorous quality control. It serves as a venue-selection and manuscript re-framing tool.

This skill provides a comprehensive advisory tool for authors targeting the journal 'Economic Review Journal' (《经济纵横》). It helps users assess the fit of their academic manuscript—covering macroeconomics, policy reform, and digital transition—by analyzing the journal's scope, required academic rigor, preferred structure, and common submission pitfalls. It functions as a pre-submission quality control mechanism.

A comprehensive skill guide designed to help researchers assess the suitability of their economics manuscripts for submission to 《Economic Review》. It covers journal positioning, required empirical rigor, structural expectations (abstract, citation style), common rejection pitfalls, and advice on necessary revisions and alternative journals. This tool is crucial for navigating academic publishing standards in Chinese economics.