Skill UI

This skill provides a systematic methodology for building comprehensive threat actor profiles using Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT). It involves gathering, correlating, and analyzing publicly available data from diverse sources (e.g., vendor reports, dark web forums, code repositories). Users can map adversary TTPs to MITRE ATT&CK, assess motivations, and build structured dossiers for proactive defensive strategies and attribution assessments.

This framework manages the ingestion, organization, synchronization, and search of knowledge across multiple storage layers, including local files, persistent memory, vector stores, and Git repositories. It provides a structured approach for ensuring knowledge durability, deduplication, and maintaining a 'single source of truth' across complex development and operational contexts.

This framework manages the ingestion, organization, synchronization, and search of knowledge across multiple storage layers, including local files, persistent memory, vector stores, and Git repositories. It provides a structured approach for ensuring knowledge durability, deduplication, and maintaining a 'single source of truth' across complex development and operational contexts.

This guide outlines the standardized requirements for declaring data and code availability in major scientific publications. It details mandatory best practices, including depositing raw data (e.g., sequencing, structures) and analysis code into approved, citable public repositories (such as GEO, PDB, Mendeley Data, and Zenodo). It also provides the required standardized three-bullet statement format for ensuring reproducibility.

A guide detailing the rigorous standards for data availability and code reproducibility required for academic manuscripts, particularly in demography. It emphasizes depositing data in FAIR-aligned repositories with persistent identifiers (DOI), providing master scripts with full version control, and documenting restricted data access conditions to ensure scientific transparency.

This guide provides best practices for ensuring scientific reproducibility in Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) manuscripts. It details how to structure supplementary materials, data tables, and analytical code to comply with modern research data policies (FAIR principles). It directs authors on depositing data into recognized community repositories (e.g., PANGAEA, Zenodo, EarthChem), ensuring that the paper's findings can be independently validated by any reader.

A comprehensive guide for environmental science manuscripts, detailing the standards required for data reporting and ensuring research reproducibility. It instructs authors on assembling Supporting Information (SI), writing data-availability statements, and depositing raw data, code, and protocols into recognized public repositories (e.g., Zenodo, GenBank).

This guide outlines the mandatory open data and code requirements for publishing in Global Change Biology (GCB). It details that primary and secondary data, along with supporting code/software, must be archived in public, DOI-minting repositories (e.g., Dryad, Zenodo) prior to acceptance. It emphasizes that 'available on request' is not accepted and provides a structured checklist for ensuring reproducibility and proper metadata submission.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for meeting modern academic publishing standards, particularly those required by educational psychology journals. It outlines mandatory requirements for ensuring research reproducibility, including depositing data, materials, and analysis code in trusted repositories with persistent identifiers (DOIs), adhering to JARS reporting standards, and documenting preregistration status.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting policy evaluation manuscripts to academic journals. It outlines the rigorous standards required to ensure full research reproducibility, detailing the process of archiving data and code in public repositories, creating master scripts, and providing documentation for restricted administrative data access.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to structure, package, and validate research artifacts for major machine learning conferences like KDD. It covers best practices for creating anonymous, reproducible repositories, handling scale claims, and providing robust evidence for different research tracks (Research, ADS, Datasets).

This comprehensive guide outlines the standardized procedures and required repositories for ensuring data and code availability in scientific publications, particularly in molecular biology. It details where to deposit various data types (e.g., sequencing, structures, proteomics) in approved archives (GEO, PDB, PRIDE, Zenodo), provides the mandatory standardized statement format, and emphasizes the need to obtain accessions/DOIs before submission to ensure reproducibility.