Skill UI

A comprehensive guide detailing the open science and reproducibility standards required for academic publications, especially those utilizing original data or conducting meta-science. It outlines critical steps such as data repository deposit, protocol preregistration, and reporting inter-rater reliability to ensure research methods are fully auditable.

This guide details the strategic placement of supplementary evidence (e.g., tuning grids, ablation studies, code) for academic submissions, particularly in conference formats like RecSys. It clarifies the difference between material belonging in the main body, the page-counted appendix, and the anonymous repository, ensuring that critical findings are visible and adhere to strict page budget constraints.

A comprehensive project management skill designed for academic submissions in Recommender Systems (RecSys). It guides users through the entire research lifecycle, from initial venue fit and data freezing to abstract submission, full paper writing, anonymous repository management, rebuttal drafting, and final camera-ready preparation. It provides backward-planning time offsets and risk identification.

This guide outlines the comprehensive policy and architecture required for submitting a fully reproducible replication package to The Review of Economics and Statistics (REStat). It details how to structure the repository, including data, master scripts, and the README file, ensuring that every result can be traced and regenerated by other researchers.

This guide details how to assemble a submission-ready replication package for top academic journals, such as The Review of Economic Studies (REStud). It covers the necessary repository structure, mandatory README sections, and coding best practices (e.g., master scripts, relative paths, version pinning) to ensure that the data and code can be fully reproduced and verified by journal editors before publication.

A comprehensive guide for packaging and submitting artifacts for Information Retrieval (IR) conferences (like SIGIR). It details the strict requirements for reproducibility, including mandatory components like TREC-format run files, qrels, and index recipes. The process covers repository structure, anonymization for review, handling data provenance, and ensuring that results can be audited by any reviewer using standard community tooling.

This guide outlines the mandatory requirements for authors publishing quantitative or mixed-method research in academic journals. It details the process of creating a complete replication package—including raw data, master scripts, seeds, and extensive README documentation—and depositing it in a trusted data repository (like Dataverse). It ensures scholarly rigor by guaranteeing that published findings are fully reproducible and traceable.

This skill performs deep 'git archaeology' by cross-referencing commit history, changelogs, and initial summaries. It extracts verified metrics like commit velocity, contributor rankings, and release timelines, generating multiple detailed reports. Use this when building a REX talk and needing factual, data-backed evidence from a source git repository.