Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting Kidney International, the flagship journal of the International Society of Nephrology (ISN). This skill helps gauge the fit of nephrology, hypertension, or kidney translational studies by checking against the journal's global scope, international clinical relevance, strict methodological bar (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), and required structure. It is a venue-selection aid, not clinical advice.

A detailed guide for researchers tackling advanced financial-mathematics problems. It outlines the stringent criteria for suitability in top-tier journals, emphasizing methodological novelty, mathematical rigor, and deep theoretical contribution (e.g., stochastic analysis, structural theorems) over routine data computation. Use this to refine and scope your research proposal.

This skill assesses the suitability and required rigor of a manuscript for the Molecular Biology and Evolution journal. It provides comprehensive guidelines covering specific scopes (e.g., population genetics, phylogenetics, positive selection), necessary methodological standards (including uncertainty quantification and addressing selection bias), and structural requirements for high-impact submissions in molecular evolution and genomics.

A comprehensive guide for qualitative theory-building, covering multi-case comparison, grounded theory, and advanced methodological rigor. Learn how to structure your study by defining case selection logic, conducting multi-level coding (open, axial, selective), ensuring theoretical saturation, and establishing trustworthiness through triangulation, member checking, and audit trails. Ideal for papers built inductively from interviews or archives.

This guide helps researchers determine if their problem constitutes a rigorous Operations Research (OR) or Management Science (MS) methodological contribution. It provides a comprehensive fit test covering method novelty, mathematical rigor (proofs, guarantees), and significance to the OR community. Furthermore, it guides users on selecting the precise editorial area (e.g., Optimization, Stochastic Models, Simulation) for submission.

A comprehensive guide for researchers to determine the optimal academic venue (e.g., PODS, SIGMOD, VLDB, ICDT) for their paper. The guide helps distinguish between contributions that are foundational theorems (theory) and those that are performance-measured systems artifacts, ensuring proper scope definition before submission.

This guide assists researchers in selecting the most appropriate and rigorous methodology for Production and Operations Management (POM) manuscripts. It covers various research tracks, including analytical modeling, stochastic process theory, game theory, causal empirical identification (DiD, IV, RD), behavioral experiments, simulation, and operations data science (ML/forecasting). It ensures the research method is tightly linked to the core operational question and possesses significant practical value.

This comprehensive skill guides researchers through the rigorous evaluation required for Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) submissions. It helps determine if a project offers a substantive contribution to opinion theory, current public opinion analysis, or survey methodology/validity, ensuring the work moves beyond generic findings. Use it to pressure-test your research scope and contribution framing before drafting.

This skill serves as the central orchestrator dashboard for authors submitting manuscripts to PR&AI (Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence). It meticulously outlines the entire publication lifecycle, from initial topic selection and structured writing to experimental design, rigorous self-review, navigating peer review stages (initial, expert, final), addressing revisions, and preparing the final camera-ready submission. It breaks down the academic process into actionable stages and critical milestones, ensuring no crucial step is overlooked during the 6-month review cycle.

A comprehensive skill for advanced meta-analysis in psychology, designed to assess the reliability and sources of heterogeneity. It performs moderator/subgroup analyses (meta-regression) to explain effect size variation and runs multiple publication-bias diagnostics (e.g., Funnel plot, Egger's test, p-curve, selection models). Essential for rigorous academic reporting requiring robust evidence and sensitivity checks.

This skill guides researchers on whether a proposed research topic is suitable for a high-level synthesis journal (like Psychological Bulletin). It assesses the existing literature's depth, general academic significance, and whether the contribution is synthesizing prior findings. It determines the most appropriate synthesis methodology—such as meta-analysis, systematic review, or qualitative meta-synthesis—by comparing the nature of the pooled data.

This guide helps researchers determine if their academic project is best suited for Quantitative Economics (QE) among top economic journals. It provides a structured fit test, guiding users to sharpen the substantive economic question and confirm that the quantitative method is necessary—not merely decorative—to answer it. It helps situate research by comparing QE against pure theory and method-first outlets.