Skill UI

This skill provides comprehensive guidance and established patterns for conducting rigorous scientific research and complex data analysis. It helps users structure their thinking process, ensuring a systematic and methodical approach to scholarly inquiry. Ideal for academic projects, literature reviews, and complex data interpretation.

A comprehensive workflow for systematically reviewing medical evidence. It allows users to search databases for clinical studies, build curated citation collections, grade evidence using established frameworks like GRADE, and generate professionally formatted, structured reports in academic citation styles (e.g., AMA). Ideal for conducting literature reviews and supporting clinical research. This tool helps transform raw medical data into actionable, structured knowledge.

Conduct rigorous, multi-database literature reviews with systematic workflows, verified citations in styles like APA or Nature, and AI-enhanced schematics for publication-ready markdown and PDF outputs in biomedical and technical domains.

Provides REST API access to PubMed for building advanced Boolean/MeSH queries, filtering by publication details, and programmatically fetching citations through E-utilities, making it ideal for systematic reviews and automated literature workflows.

Conduct comprehensive systematic literature reviews across biomedical and scientific domains using multiple academic databases. Synthesize findings, verify citations, and generate professional markdown or PDF documents. Includes AI-generated scientific schematics for visual enhancement. Ideal for research synthesis, meta-analyses, and thesis writing.

This skill performs a structured Systematic Literature Review (SLR) by analyzing multiple academic papers on a given topic. It searches academic databases (like arXiv), extracts structured metadata (research questions, methodologies, key findings, limitations) from the entire set of papers, and synthesizes overarching themes and research trends. It is ideal for creating comprehensive literature surveys, annotated bibliographies, and cross-paper comparisons, outputting reports in professional citation formats like APA, IEEE, or BibTeX.

This guide provides a comprehensive workflow for searching and retrieving biomedical literature from PubMed and NCBI. It covers advanced query construction using MeSH terms and specific field tags, advanced filtering (date, publication type), and a repeatable programmatic workflow using NCBI E-utilities (esearch, efetch). Essential for researchers conducting systematic reviews and literature monitoring.

A comprehensive tool designed for academic literature orientation. It searches papers using free keyless APIs (PubMed and OpenAlex) and builds a structured 'launching pad' guide, rather than a finished review. It helps researchers define their scope using frameworks like PICO/SPIDER, ensuring a confident and systematic starting point for deep research in unfamiliar fields.

This meta-skill processes an entire Excel workbook to extract deep business insights. It systematically reads all data, performs structured trend and anomaly analysis, writes the comprehensive results back into a dedicated 'Insights' sheet, and permanently stores key performance indicators (KPIs) in long-term memory. Ideal for detailed business review and data deep-dives.

This guide provides a comprehensive workflow for searching and retrieving biomedical literature from PubMed and NCBI. It covers advanced query construction using MeSH terms and specific field tags, advanced filtering (date, publication type), and a repeatable programmatic workflow using NCBI E-utilities (esearch, efetch). Essential for researchers conducting systematic reviews and literature monitoring.

This framework provides a rigorous methodology for conducting systematic literature reviews and comprehensive academic syntheses. It guides researchers through building transparent coverage, designing robust coding matrices, and choosing the correct integration method (narrative, systematic, or bibliometric) to move beyond simple summarization and create an auditable intellectual map of a field.

This skill guides authors through evaluating the suitability of their clinical research manuscript for Annals of Internal Medicine. It provides deep insights into the journal's high standards, including specific methodological requirements (CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE, STARD, TRIPOD), required evidence synthesis depth, ideal scope (RCTs, systematic reviews, guidelines), and current house style guidelines necessary for successful submission.