Skill UI

Enables Claude to apply anomaly-detection-system workflows for spotting outliers, fraud, or unusual patterns across datasets, selecting tailored algorithms like Isolation Forest and summarizing deviations for any data monitoring or security use case.

A practical decision framework for determining whether to use regular expressions or Large Language Models (LLMs) when parsing structured text (e.g., forms, quizzes, invoices). It recommends starting with deterministic, low-cost regex for 95-98% of structured data, and only invoking expensive LLM calls for identifying and validating ambiguous edge cases, optimizing both cost and accuracy.

This skill provides structured procedures and Python examples for detecting internal data exfiltration. It analyzes endpoint, cloud, and email logs by establishing behavioral baselines and performing statistical anomaly detection. Use cases include investigating insider threats, monitoring DLP policy violations, and building robust User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) rules for SOC teams.

This skill guides security teams on systematically tuning SIEM detection rules in platforms like Splunk and Elastic. It focuses on reducing alert fatigue and false positives by analyzing historical alert volumes, establishing environmental baselines, creating context-aware whitelists, and measuring detection efficacy using metrics like precision and recall. This is crucial for maturing a Security Operations Center (SOC).

This comprehensive guide outlines a structured workflow for investigating insider threats—incidents where authorized employees or contractors misuse their access to steal data or sabotage systems. It integrates DLP alerts, User Behavior Analytics (UBA), and digital forensics, emphasizing mandatory collaboration between Legal, HR, and Security teams to build an admissible, evidence-based case.

Bilig WorkPaper provides a code-first runtime environment for complex spreadsheet business logic. It allows agents to interact with structured data using formulas and JSON workbooks via deterministic API calls (MCP/TypeScript). This is ideal for replacing unreliable UI automation in use cases like quote calculators, budget modeling, and data validation, ensuring calculation integrity through explicit read-back proof.

This advanced helper assists users in writing, debugging, and validating complex formulas, pivot tables, and array functions for platforms like Excel and Google Sheets. It ensures formulas are robust by handling common edge cases (e.g., blank rows, mixed data types, time zone quirks) and provides detailed, worked examples. It also manages cross-platform dialect translation.

This skill processes raw, unstructured materials (e.g., conversations, reports, controversies) into highly structured, reusable casebook entries. It focuses on identifying core facts, defining mechanism chains, and mapping responsibility links while ensuring rigorous data anonymization. It is designed for deep knowledge management and pattern recognition, helping users build a reliable, reusable knowledge base for future professional analysis, rather than generating immediate advice.

A practical decision framework for determining whether to use regular expressions or Large Language Models (LLMs) when parsing structured text (e.g., forms, quizzes, invoices). It recommends starting with deterministic, low-cost regex for 95-98% of structured data, and only invoking expensive LLM calls for identifying and validating ambiguous edge cases, optimizing both cost and accuracy.

This skill provides a rigorous framework for defending the methodology of advanced educational research manuscripts, suitable for top-tier academic journals. It guides users through defining research structure across quantitative (e.g., multilevel, quasi-experimental), qualitative (e.g., ethnography, case study), and mixed methods paradigms. Focus areas include addressing rival explanations, ensuring measurement validity, establishing causal claims, and meeting stringent reporting standards (AERA).

A comprehensive guide for structuring and defending the methodological design of social science manuscripts, particularly for high-impact journals like AJS. It covers diverse traditions—including quantitative, comparative-historical, ethnographic, and network analysis—ensuring the design rigorously supports the theoretical claim, rather than just presenting data. Use this when justifying case selection, identifying assumptions, or linking field observations to major theoretical arguments.

This guide assists researchers in strengthening the methodological rigor of academic work, particularly in political science. It provides structured methods for defending research design, covering rigorous causal identification for quantitative work (e.g., DiD, IV, RDD) and systematic case selection/process tracing for qualitative analysis. Use this when facing reviewer skepticism or preparing a pre-analysis plan to ensure the evidence credibly connects to the theoretical argument.