Skill UI

This guide helps researchers evaluate whether a security or privacy project is a suitable fit for top-tier academic conferences like IEEE S&P. It covers critical fit tests, such as establishing a defensible threat model and ensuring end-to-end evidence closure. It also provides advice on SoK paper formats, routing among major security venues (USENIX, CCS, NDSS), and adhering to submission rules like one-year embargoes.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for structuring advanced humanities essays, particularly for major academic journals. It emphasizes building a clear, thesis-driven argument that unfolds naturally, avoiding rigid IMRaD formats. Use it when outlining, restructuring confusing drafts, or needing to ensure the argument's significance remains visible throughout the body.

A comprehensive guide on structuring robustness checks for academic papers, particularly for Law, Economics, and Organization journals. Instead of simply listing additional tables, this method teaches how to organize checks by specific theoretical threats (selection bias, endogeneity, measurement error, alternative mechanisms) to strengthen the core institutional claim and anticipate referee criticism.

This tool converts various academic citation formats (e.g., APA, Harvard) into the specific Vancouver/ICMJE numbered style required by the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). It ensures citations are numbered sequentially by appearance, handles limited author lists (first 6 + et al.), uses NLM abbreviations for journals, and performs a comprehensive evidence audit, ensuring the manuscript adheres to the strict standards of high-impact medical publishing.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with a strategic framework for submitting academic manuscripts to top-tier journals. It details best practices for suggesting and opposing expert reviewers, and, crucially, performing an 'objection pre-mortem.' By anticipating common critiques (e.g., lack of novelty, identification threats) and preparing robust counter-arguments beforehand, authors can significantly strengthen their paper and increase their chances of acceptance.

This guide details the rigorous, multi-round editing process for legal scholars submitting to high-level academic journals like The Yale Law Journal (YLJ). It trains users on navigating substantive critiques, resolving complex source-pull and citation queries, and adapting the writing process for fast-paced online formats (YLJ Forum). The focus is on maintaining legal integrity and argumentative coherence throughout the intensive revision cycle.