Skill UI

This comprehensive guide provides structured frameworks and best practices for all developer advocacy activities. Use it to plan conference talks (including CFP templates), prepare live coding demos with the 10-3-1 rule, and strategize for podcast appearances and building in public. It covers everything from audience context to presentation polish.

A comprehensive guide for translating complex, real-world management settings into formal, rigorous mathematical models suitable for high-level academic journals. It provides a systematic framework (Situational Element $\rightarrow$ Model Element Mapping) for developing optimization, game, and data-driven models, ensuring that the model structure, assumptions, and novelty are explicitly defensible against academic critiques.

This tool serves as the central orchestrator for developing and submitting manuscripts to Current Anthropology (CA). It guides authors through the entire academic lifecycle, helping them determine the correct article type (Major Article, Report, Forum, etc.), appropriate subfield, and the necessary current stage (e.g., theory building, data analysis, ethics review). It ensures submissions are robust enough to withstand the rigorous CA✩ commentary and reply process.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a point-by-point rebuttal letter after receiving a major revision decision from a top-tier academic journal. It emphasizes strategic communication, prioritizing the Senior Editor's concerns, addressing technical issues in the appropriate disciplinary 'currency,' and maintaining a developmental, professional tone to maximize the chances of acceptance.

This router is designed to guide authors through the entire, highly structured process of developing and submitting an academic manuscript specifically to the Journal of Accounting Research (JAR). It does not perform the research itself but acts as a decision tool, directing the user to the next most appropriate specialized skill—whether it's refining the core topic, strengthening the economic theory, executing data analysis, or drafting a rebuttal response—ensuring a coherent and high-quality research workflow.

This workflow orchestrates the entire manuscript submission process for the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP). It guides authors by ensuring the paper addresses two critical standards: a theoretical contribution to I-O science, and high rigor in design and measurement. It routes users through specific stages—from topic selection and theory development to study design, data analysis, and revision.

This guide helps authors determine if their academic essay—focused on the theory, method, or history of literary study—is appropriate for high-level theoretical journals like New Literary History. It emphasizes developing original theoretical or methodological questions, re-framing existing readings, and understanding the rigorous academic bar required for publication in the humanities.

This tool serves as an orchestrator for developing Public Administration Review (PAR) manuscripts. It guides researchers through the entire writing lifecycle—from initial topic selection and literature positioning to theory building, data analysis, and final submission/rebuttal. It helps users determine the most appropriate article type (e.g., Scholarly Take, Conceptualizing PA) and maps the necessary steps to ensure the work bridges both academic theory and practical public management relevance.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for researchers to assess if their development-related work is suitable for World Development (WD). It moves beyond mere methodological rigor, focusing instead on the paper's multidisciplinary relevance, real-world policy stakes, and ability to advance global understanding of development problems (e.g., poverty, governance, inequality). It helps authors ensure their findings appeal to a broad academic and policy audience.

This skill guides the construction of complex legal arguments, adhering to the standard persuasive arc: doctrine → theory → normative. It ensures the writing systematically moves from mapping existing law (the problem) to developing a conceptual framework (the why) and finally proposing actionable reforms (the fix). It is essential for building a rigorous, logical, and comprehensive academic argument.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for contributors to The Yale Law Journal (YLJ). It guides the user through the entire submission lifecycle, from initial topic selection and thesis development to Bluebook citation checking and final placement strategy. It emphasizes that submissions must be near-final, highly structured, and fully footnoted, directing the user to the appropriate skill path based on the article's track (Article, Note, Feature, etc.) and current stage.