Skill UI

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for structuring advanced humanities essays, particularly for major academic journals. It emphasizes building a clear, thesis-driven argument that unfolds naturally, avoiding rigid IMRaD formats. Use it when outlining, restructuring confusing drafts, or needing to ensure the argument's significance remains visible throughout the body.

This tool polishes academic prose to meet the high standards of the Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR). It helps refine scholarly articles to be rigorous, analytic, gender-neutral, and accessible to specialists and non-specialists alike. It emphasizes argument-forward structure, clear definition of terms, and adherence to specific house conventions.

This skill guides authors through the crucial decision of selecting the correct JACS format (Article or Communication). It provides detailed strategies for rightsizing the manuscript, determining what essential evidence belongs in the main text, and what detailed data should be moved to the Supplementary Information (SI), ensuring compliance with rigorous journal norms.

This guide helps researchers rigorously evaluate their chemical findings against the high standards of flagship journals like JACS. It teaches how to assess both the 'Advance' (novelty and importance) and 'Breadth' (general applicability) of a discovery, ensuring the manuscript is pitched correctly to avoid subfield-only publications. It also advises on choosing the appropriate format (Article vs. Communication).

This guide helps researchers assess if a corporate finance question is suitable for the Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF). It provides a framework to determine if the topic fits the journal's empirical or theoretical remit (e.g., governance, M&A, financial structure) and advises on the optimal article format (full-length vs. shorter paper). It serves as a critical self-check against common academic rejection pitfalls.

This tool helps refine academic survey articles to adopt the authoritative and accessible "JEL voice." It focuses on improving prose structure, ensuring the narrative flows for non-specialist economists, and structuring the introduction and abstract according to academic conventions. It transforms summary writing into synthesis dialogue, making complex topics engaging for a broad audience.

A comprehensive guide for structuring persuasive proposals or symposium pitches for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). Learn how to convince editors that a balanced, accessible, and novel article or theme exists, focusing on the necessary components like the 'why now,' core takeaways, and balance plan, rather than writing the full manuscript.

This router guides authors through the entire process of developing a compelling, non-technical synthesis article for a broad audience, specifically for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). It determines the optimal next skill to use—whether focusing on topic selection, narrative structure, improving accessibility, ensuring balance, or drafting the initial proposal—ensuring the final product reads as an accessible essay rather than a specialized research paper.

A comprehensive style guide designed for drafting and polishing rigorous economic theory manuscripts following the standards of the Journal of Economic Theory (JET). It emphasizes the theorem-proof structure, strict notation discipline, proper LaTeX formatting (elsarticle), and adherence to academic rigor, ensuring clarity for expert reviewers.

This tool is designed to polish academic prose for submissions to the Journal of Marketing (JM). It helps restructure the argument by front-loading the real-world phenomenon and managerial relevance, ensuring the writing is accessible to a general, scholarly, and managerial audience. It enforces adherence to AMA house style, citation rules, and formatting standards, transforming specialized memos into high-impact scholarly articles.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final pre-submission checks for the Journal of Management Studies (JMS). It covers critical academic requirements, including full double-blind anonymization, correct Harvard referencing, adherence to inclusive word count limits (including tables/figures/references), and proper article type selection. Use this before submitting via ScholarOne to ensure your manuscript meets the journal's high standards.

This skill guides political science scholars through the rigorous process of assessing whether their research project meets the high standards of top-tier journals (e.g., The Journal of Politics). It focuses on evaluating the work for general interest, theoretical innovation, methodological diversity, and appropriate scope (Research Article vs. Short Article) to maximize publication chances.