Skill UI

This guide details how to read, interpret, and synthesize artifacts from the central shared workspace, known as the 'bench.' It provides a structured approach to gathering findings, reports, and assessments left by various modules (desks). Use this skill to build comprehensive context, understand cross-desk dependencies, and summarize complex information for an operator.

This guide provides a detailed walkthrough of the rigorous review process at International Organizations (IO). It covers aspects like double-blind peer review, specialized expert assessment, and the distinctive verification stage where quantitative results and formal proofs are re-run. Use this to pre-empt potential failure modes and structure your manuscript for maximum impact before submission.

This guide teaches the strategic art of positioning a theoretical paper for top-tier academic journals, specifically focusing on the requirements of the Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS). It details how to structure the introduction to establish a 'live conversation,' cite the field's canon, and justify the contribution's unique place, moving beyond simple gap-spotting. Mastering positioning is crucial for passing the editor's initial fit assessment.

This skill guides authors in assessing whether their economic research is suitable for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). JEP specializes in publishing accessible, non-technical, and synthetic articles aimed at a broad readership of economists. It helps authors shift their focus from complex empirical estimations to clear exposition, balanced synthesis, and general intellectual framing, providing a comprehensive pre-submission checklist.

A comprehensive skill designed to help researchers determine if their multidisciplinary, open-access manuscript is suitable for Nature Communications. It guides assessment across journal positioning, scope fit, methodological rigor, evidence standards, and structural requirements, ensuring submissions meet the high bar for cross-disciplinary scientific publications.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with deep insight into Nature Immunology's high standards. It covers everything from field-shifting scientific significance and required mechanistic evidence (e.g., in vivo models, scRNA-seq) to specific house styles, abstract structure, and optimal venue selection. Use this skill for pre-submission vetting and improving the conceptual framing of your immunology research.

This guide provides a framework for assessing whether a research topic is suitable for interdisciplinary journals focusing on digital media and society (like NM&S). It details a four-part fit test, ensuring the research has social stakes, a portable concept, interdisciplinary reach, and enduring relevance beyond the news cycle. It helps researchers reframe narrow case studies into broadly applicable scholarly arguments.

This guide provides a structured framework for academics to elevate their research topics. It instructs authors on transforming narrow empirical questions into major theoretical and institutional debates, connecting research to core societal issues (China, World, Era). It emphasizes moving beyond simple policy assessment to address structural contradictions and theoretical gaps, suitable for advanced academic writing.

This skill assesses whether a manuscript is suitable for World Development, a leading multidisciplinary development-studies journal. It guides authors on re-framing their work to focus on real-world development problems, policy relevance, and global issues (e.g., poverty, climate, governance). It clarifies the required balance between rigorous methodology and multidisciplinary, actionable insights for a broad academic readership.

A rigorous methodology for systematic problem diagnosis and consequential decision-making. It operates in two modes: Problem Analysis (for root cause identification using IS/IS-NOT contrast) and Decision Analysis (for prioritizing options by screening MUSTs, weighting WANTs, and assessing adverse consequences). Ideal for complex engineering and business scenarios requiring structured evidence and risk assessment.

A comprehensive EQ development system based on Mayer-Salovey and Goleman models, covering self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management. Provides scientific assessments (MSCEIT, EQ-i 2.0, TEIQue) and practical training methods for personal growth, workplace success, and leadership development.

This skill simulates the experience of a senior judge reviewing a written legal argument, submission, or academic paper for the first time under time pressure. It provides a structured, objective assessment of clarity, structure, and persuasive force, detailing areas of confusion, perceived strengths, and unproven assumptions without suggesting revisions or improvements. Ideal for refining core legal and policy arguments.