Skill UI

Draft concise AAAI author responses (rebuttals) under strict character limits, no-URL rules, and no-new-results guidance. Prioritize decision-critical factual corrections, handle AI-generated reviews, and optimize limited space to influence SPC/AC discussions.

A comprehensive audit checklist for authors submitting papers to major NLP conferences (like ACL) via OpenReview. This guide covers mandatory formatting rules, maintaining anonymity, addressing ethical declarations (Responsible NLP), managing resubmission links, and ensuring adherence to the entire submission workflow to prevent desk rejection.

This skill guides authors on whether their concise energy science research meets the high-impact, selective criteria of ACS Energy Letters. It provides comprehensive guidelines covering journal positioning, required novelty, evidence rigor, and specific structural rules for areas like photovoltaics, batteries, and electrocatalysis, ensuring the submitted work is a timely and significant single advance.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final steps before submitting a manuscript to The American Historical Review (AHR) via ScholarOne. It ensures adherence to strict double-blind anonymity rules, specific formatting standards (Times New Roman, double-spaced, 8,000-word limit), Chicago manual style notes (no bibliography), and proper handling of image permissions, preventing common submission failures.

This skill guides authors in refining and polishing academic manuscripts for submission to top-tier political science journals, such as APSR. It teaches how to tighten prose, ensure cross-subfield readability, adhere to stringent formatting rules (APSA Style Manual), and manage strict word count limits without sacrificing intellectual rigor. Use this when preparing a final draft for publication.

This guide provides a detailed framework for authors to strategically place content within technical conference papers. It outlines the distinct roles of the extended abstract, main body, appendix, and artifact, ensuring that all acceptance-critical information is positioned where reviewers are required to read it. Following these rules maximizes the paper's chances of successful peer review acceptance.

This comprehensive guide instructs authors on the entire process of responding to reviewer reports (R&R) for academic journals. It details the mandatory structure, tone, and strategic approaches for writing a detailed, point-by-point rebuttal letter, ensuring compliance with double-blind review rules and maintaining academic rigor.

This guide provides an in-depth analysis of the CIKM peer review process, which operates under double-blind rules and integrates perspectives from three distinct fields: Information Retrieval, Data Mining, and Knowledge Management. It details how authors can optimize their submissions to satisfy diverse expert standards, how to interpret complex, multi-faceted review reports, and the critical dynamics that determine a paper's acceptance status.

This guide provides detailed rules for structuring long-form academic papers submitted to the Chinese Journal of Computers (CJC). It teaches authors how to strategically divide content into the main text, appendices, and supplementary materials. The core principle emphasizes that all decision-making evidence required for acceptance must reside in the main manuscript, while supporting details, full proofs, and extra tables belong in supplementary sections.

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous submission process for major academic conferences like COLM. It covers strict formatting rules (e.g., 9-page limit), maintaining double-blind anonymity, mandatory LLM usage disclosure, and techniques for preventing identity leaks through technical sweeps. Essential reading for authors navigating the complex academic publishing lifecycle.

This skill acts as an expert guide for authors targeting the journal 'Contemporary Finance and Economics.' It helps authors evaluate their academic manuscripts against the journal's specific positioning, thematic preferences (e.g., finance, regional economy), submission requirements (double-blind review, citation styles, abstract rules), and common rejection pitfalls. It is essential for structuring and refining a paper before official submission.

Provides a comprehensive strategy for responding to major journal revisions, especially in Earth and Planetary Science. It guides authors on how to satisfy conflicting technical demands from multiple reviewers by routing detailed evidence to supplements while keeping the main text concise, persuasive, and compliant with strict formatting rules.