Skill UI

An adversarial thinking partner designed for founders and C-suite executives. It stress-tests business plans, simulates difficult board meetings, and facilitates brutally honest post-mortems, ensuring vulnerabilities are found before competitors or boards do. Use when you need to challenge assumptions and face hard decisions.

This skill is designed for generating structured, insightful, and boundary-aware short answers, such as reader replies, editor responses, or consultation advice. It structures analysis by defining fact boundaries, providing structural judgment, offering necessary critique, and suggesting safe, low-risk next steps. It is primarily activated by the CrossFrame Suite, ensuring the output maintains a canonical Chinese semantic layer while providing professional, actionable advice.

This guide helps researchers strategically assess whether their empirical microeconomics project is best suited for the American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied). It provides a structured framework to test the project's causal design, scope, and cross-field appeal, ensuring the question is 'AEJ: Applied-shaped' rather than being too general (AER) or too specialized (Field Journal).

This guide helps researchers assess the optimal venue for their work, determining if their project aligns best with AISTATS, or if it is better suited for major ML conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR), UAI, or specific statistics journals. It emphasizes the need for strong statistical foundations, inference guarantees, and the unique intersection of AI, ML, and statistics before starting the writing process.

This guide helps researchers determine if their economic study is best suited for the Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO). It focuses on refining the 'behavioral hook,' identifying the core mechanisms (like bounded rationality or biases), and distinguishing the paper's contribution from other specialized economic journals.

This skill guides authors in determining if their academic work is best suited for the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL). It assesses whether the piece is an authoritative, synthetic review essay, focusing on synthesizing existing knowledge and setting an academic agenda, rather than presenting new empirical results. It helps authors properly frame their contribution, understand the required structure, and navigate the specialized submission criteria for top-tier economic journals.

This guide helps researchers evaluate the scope and general significance of their theoretical computer science work. It introduces the 'breadth test' (corridor, lineage, technique) and a detailed routing map to advise whether the paper is best suited for a flagship, broad-scope venue like STOC, or a more specialized conference (e.g., SODA, ITCS, CCC). It provides a structured decision procedure for optimizing academic publication success.

This tool helps authors determine if their food science work is best suited for a critical review or trend analysis within the scope of this specific journal. It guides authors to focus on synthesizing existing literature, identifying research gaps, and charting future directions, rather than presenting original primary experimental data.