Skill UI

This guide teaches users how to transform a collection of historical facts and sources into a sustained, contestable, and nuanced academic argument. It focuses on establishing a clear thesis, defining the stakes, building evidence chains, and proactively addressing counter-arguments, moving beyond mere description to provide genuine scholarly contribution.

This guide provides detailed instructions for elevating academic prose from standard "lab-report" style to the sophisticated narrative craft expected by top-tier journals. It covers structuring the argument, maintaining theoretical focus, refining voice (process vs. variance), and perfecting the narrative arc to ensure the work reads as a compelling intellectual story, not just a collection of findings. Use this when your theory and analysis are settled, but the writing feels flat or dense.

A comprehensive guide to restructuring scientific manuscripts from a collection of isolated findings into a single, compelling, and cohesive narrative arc. It forces the story into a Hypothesis → Mechanism → Significance structure, ensuring that every figure advances a central, airtight argument, crucial for top-tier journal submissions.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to revise-and-resubmit reports in Experimental Economics (ExpEcon). It details how to triage complex reviewer comments, plan for necessary new data collection (new treatments, more sessions), address critical methodological concerns like deception or power deficits, and structure a highly persuasive, point-by-point response letter.

This guide helps researchers elevate local, sub-field specific findings into global-scale scientific contributions. It teaches how to structure a manuscript by anchoring the work on driver-response literature, speaking across different Earth systems (e.g., terrestrial and marine), and engaging with major synthesis meta-analyses. Use this when your work needs to prove broader applicability beyond its initial data collection site.

A comprehensive guide for managing the highly critical stage of journal revision. This skill helps researchers decode editor feedback, strategically decide on necessary data collection (e.g., new countries, invariance tests), and structure a professional, point-by-point response letter that addresses every reviewer comment effectively while maintaining scholarly rigor.

A structured framework designed for authors writing comprehensive psychological reviews or theoretical statements. It guides users to transform a collection of research papers into a single, cohesive, and provocative argument by imposing a unifying structure—such as a taxonomy, theoretical model, or question sequence—that defines the field's central claim.