Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) management within Quality Management Systems (QMS), specifically tailored for medical devices. It covers the entire investigation lifecycle, including root cause analysis (RCA) using methodologies like 5-Why and Fishbone diagrams, developing robust corrective actions, and verifying effectiveness to ensure continuous compliance and quality improvement.

This guide facilitates comprehensive tabletop exercises simulating major ransomware incidents. It systematically tests an organization's preparedness, decision-making processes, and communication protocols across executive, legal, PR, and technical teams. Scenarios cover double extortion, regulatory compliance (GDPR, HIPAA), and varying backup compromise levels, helping organizations identify critical gaps before a real-world attack.

This skill simulates security incidents using discussion-based tabletop exercises for Security Operations Center (SOC) teams. It is designed to test incident response procedures, evaluate cross-functional communication workflows (e.g., Legal, PR, Executive), and assess decision-making capabilities under pressure, all without touching production environments. Ideal for compliance validation, playbook refinement, and comprehensive team training.

A comprehensive simulation of a General Counsel's (GC) review process. It interrogates contracts, term sheets, and agreements across critical legal domains: IP ownership, liability caps, data privacy (GDPR/CCPA), regulatory compliance (HIPAA/FDA), and employment structure. Use this before signing major agreements or entering new markets to identify hidden legal and operational risks.

A meta-orchestrator designed for compliance teams to manage complex, multi-jurisdictional compliance programs. It automatically selects applicable regulatory frameworks (e.g., ISO 27001, GDPR, EU AI Act, HIPAA), computes control overlap across standards, simulates mock audits, and consolidates evidence into a unified reuse map. Ideal for planning annual audits or achieving multi-certification.

Generates a comprehensive, prioritized compliance checklist for major frameworks like GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and more. This tool performs detailed gap analysis, identifies quick wins, and structures a phased implementation roadmap, making it essential for audit preparation and maintaining regulatory adherence.

A comprehensive checklist for authors submitting to the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ). This guide walks users through critical pre-submission steps, ensuring proper masking, adherence to APA 7th edition guidelines, and compliance with journal-specific requirements (e.g., length, abstract word count) before uploading to ScholarOne Manuscripts.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors submitting theory-only manuscripts to the Academy of Management Review (AMR). It ensures compliance with AOM formatting, rigorous anonymity standards, correct scope definition (must build new theory, no data), and ethical guidelines, minimizing desk rejection risk. It is designed for conceptual, non-empirical work.

This skill guides authors submitting art historical manuscripts to the Association for Art History journal. It assesses the fit by focusing on the manuscript's theoretical depth, methodological originality, critical engagement, and command of primary sources. It helps authors re-frame their work from mere description to an original argument with clear conceptual and historiographical stakes, ensuring compliance with top-tier academic publishing standards.

A comprehensive checklist detailing all mandatory requirements for submitting academic manuscripts (e.g., Contemporary Accounting Research). It verifies compliance on key areas including length limits, abstract word count, separated title pages, blind manuscripts, ethics approval (IRB/REB), data integrity statements, and correct payment proof. Use this before the final upload to ensure maximum readiness and avoid editorial rejection.

This comprehensive guide instructs authors on the entire process of responding to reviewer reports (R&R) for academic journals. It details the mandatory structure, tone, and strategic approaches for writing a detailed, point-by-point rebuttal letter, ensuring compliance with double-blind review rules and maintaining academic rigor.

A comprehensive guide designed to help researchers evaluate the suitability of their manuscript for 'China Rural Survey.' It covers the journal's academic scope, key thematic interests (e.g., land tenure, rural governance), required structural elements, and critical submission protocols (such as double-blind review, data/code public disclosure, and abstract formatting). Use this tool to refine your argument and ensure compliance before formal submission.