Skill UI

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous peer-review pipeline of top academic conferences (like OSDI). It covers multi-round double-blind review, strategies for conditional acceptance, heavy shepherding, and optimizing your paper's structure to survive early triage rounds. Essential reading for researchers aiming to publish high-impact, publishable work.

A comprehensive guide detailing the specific narrative arc and strict formatting rules for writing technical papers for top-tier system conferences like OSDI. It teaches authors how to structure an argument—from identifying operational pain points to proposing a novel mechanism and presenting measurable results—while adhering to strict constraints such as the 12-page limit and avoiding appendices. This skill focuses on improving scholarly communication and technical clarity.

This guide provides strict guidelines for structuring supplementary material for PerCom conference papers. The core rule is that the main paper body (within the tight 9-page budget) must be self-contained, allowing a reviewer to make a decision without accessing the dataset or appendix. Learn how to properly partition evidence, manage page budgets, and adhere to double-blind review rules.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors responding to reviewer objections after a major technical conference submission (e.g., PLDI). It details how to triage structural critiques—including factual errors, soundness doubts, and evaluation gaps—and emphasizes maintaining academic rigor, adhering strictly to the original scope, and avoiding promises of unproven new contributions.

This guide details how to structure and write the 'Related Work' section for highly competitive academic venues like PLDI. It emphasizes moving beyond simple citation listings by forcing the author to identify and articulate the specific technical 'delta' (improvement) their paper provides over every prior technique, while also covering inter-conference comparisons and proper bibliography formatting.

A comprehensive guide detailing the entire academic review lifecycle for top-tier programming language conferences like PLDI. It covers every critical stage, from initial submission and double-blind review through author responses, final acceptance criteria, and post-publication artifact evaluation. Learn what Program Chairs look for, how to address soundness doubts, and how to optimize your paper for maximum impact.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting technical papers to top compiler and systems conferences (like PLDI). It teaches how to structure an argument as a rigorous engineering case, focusing on stating the 'hard case' first, describing mechanisms rather than using adjectives, and ensuring every claim is directly backed by evidence throughout the paper.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing a rebuttal or response to peer reviews for major academic conferences. It details how to maximize impact by focusing exclusively on correcting factual proof misreadings, supplying missing lemmas, and clarifying technical bounds, while strictly avoiding arguments of significance or taste. Emphasizes maintaining anonymity and adherence to the double-blind format.

A comprehensive guide for positioning research in distributed-computing theory, specifically for conferences like PODC. It details how to move beyond topic listings to defining a precise 'delta' by comparing models, bounds, and costs against prior art. Crucial advice includes distinguishing between different synchrony models, fault tolerances, and handling self-citation in double-blind reviews.

This guide provides guidelines for ensuring that academic proofs are independently verifiable, particularly for proofs-focused conferences. It covers creating self-contained proof appendices, meticulously defining all underlying assumptions in a 'model box' contract, and ensuring perfect synchronization between the short conference proceedings and the full arXiv version.

A comprehensive audit checklist for authors preparing submissions for top-tier academic conferences like PODC. This guide covers critical submission stages, including the two-step abstract registration, selecting the appropriate paper track (Regular vs. Brief Announcement), adhering to the 10-page merits rule, maintaining double-blind anonymity, and ensuring the mathematical rigor of the proof. Use this before final submission.

A comprehensive guide for authors on navigating the two distinct response phases of academic conferences (e.g., PODS). It details how to write a concise, double-anonymous rebuttal (48-hour turn) and a structured revision cover letter, ensuring all technical gaps are addressed while maintaining anonymity and professional rigor.