Skill UI

Utilizes structured critical reasoning to rigorously stress-test ideas, plans, and decisions. This skill allows you to play devil's advocate, conduct pre-mortems, execute red-teaming exercises, or audit underlying assumptions. It employs multiple advanced modes, including Socratic questioning, Hegelian dialectics, and Falsificationism, to identify blind spots, weaknesses, and unstated assumptions before commitment.

Guide VP/CPO transitions through a 30-60-90-day diagnostic onboarding that emphasizes learning, evidence gathering, and phased decisions instead of premature execution.

An adversarial thinking partner designed for founders and C-suite executives. It stress-tests business plans, simulates difficult board meetings, and facilitates brutally honest post-mortems, ensuring vulnerabilities are found before competitors or boards do. Use when you need to challenge assumptions and face hard decisions.

This guide facilitates comprehensive tabletop exercises simulating major ransomware incidents. It systematically tests an organization's preparedness, decision-making processes, and communication protocols across executive, legal, PR, and technical teams. Scenarios cover double extortion, regulatory compliance (GDPR, HIPAA), and varying backup compromise levels, helping organizations identify critical gaps before a real-world attack.

This skill simulates security incidents using discussion-based tabletop exercises for Security Operations Center (SOC) teams. It is designed to test incident response procedures, evaluate cross-functional communication workflows (e.g., Legal, PR, Executive), and assess decision-making capabilities under pressure, all without touching production environments. Ideal for compliance validation, playbook refinement, and comprehensive team training.

A comprehensive academic advisor covering the entire university journey. It guides students through major selection, GPA management, graduate school applications (Chinese and Western systems), study abroad planning, and career transition. Methodology includes Socratic questioning and structured decision-making to help users make informed, autonomous academic choices.

A powerful cognitive tool that moves beyond surface-level brainstorming. It forces users to systematically deconstruct complex problems down to their 'irreducible truths.' The skill identifies 8-12 hidden assumptions (Surface, Middle, Deep), classifies them (Fact, Convention, Belief, Interest-Driven), and ranks them by Fragility × Impact. This process allows users to stress-test their premises and rebuild conclusions based only on verified realities, making it invaluable for major life decisions or business hypothesis testing.

A multi-phase workflow designed to guide users through complex problem analysis and solution design. Instead of providing immediate answers, it systematically enforces deep thinking by reviewing the problem's validity, assessing information gaps, performing root cause analysis, and iterating through solution vetting (self-check and final review). Ideal for complex technical troubleshooting, decision-making, or theoretical discussions requiring rigorous methodology.

This skill acts as an intensive sparring partner, rigorously questioning any provided plan, design, or concept. It guides the user through every decision branch, resolving dependencies one by one until a comprehensive and shared understanding is achieved. Ideal for stress-testing ideas, identifying blind spots, and ensuring the robustness of complex projects before implementation.

This mode acts as a structured thinking partner, guiding users through ambiguous problems, complex decisions, and open-ended strategy questions. Instead of providing direct answers, it focuses on challenging assumptions, asking clarifying questions, surfacing multiple perspectives (e.g., stakeholder views), and helping the user structure their thought process using advanced techniques like reframing, pre-mortem analysis, and identifying critical constraints. Ideal for product managers and leaders who need to explore ideas without a clear path forward.

This skill guides users who feel stuck or overwhelmed by providing a structured, branching approach to complex problems. Instead of giving vague advice, it asks clarifying questions (3-5 options) at each level, progressively narrowing the infinite problem space until concrete, actionable steps are identified. Ideal for career changes, starting businesses, or making major life decisions.

This framework serves as a rigorous thought partner, designed to challenge underlying assumptions, separate raw evidence from interpretation, and ensure that all conclusions are fully defensible. It guides users to define clear decision goals, test counterfactuals, and calibrate claims strictly to the available data quality. Ideal for high-stakes projects where the cost of error is significant.