Skill UI

Drafts structured, high-quality grant proposals for major international and national funding agencies (e.g., NSF, KAKENHI, ERC, NSFC). This skill guides the user through the entire grant writing pipeline, transforming validated research ideas and literature into a reviewer-ready application that meets specific structural, narrative, and formatting requirements, significantly increasing funding success rates.

This tool helps you draft, rewrite, or condense professional emails with precise control over tone, length, and audience. Whether you are performing cold outreach, providing status updates, or handling escalations, it ensures your communication is clear, concise, and impactful. It guides the process from outlining key points to providing structured variants and QA checks.

This tool standardizes the process of triaging and responding to customer support tickets, emails, or chats. It analyzes incoming text to identify issue type, product area, and severity, then categorizes the ticket, sets a priority level, drafts an empathetic response, and generates internal action items for efficient handling across platforms like Zendesk or Intercom.

This specialized skill guides the creation of long-form structural critical essays and detailed academic dossiers, primarily for Chinese academic contexts. It utilizes the CrossFrame methodology to first establish a foundational structure, define evidence boundaries, and identify key mechanisms, before applying a critical matrix. The output is highly structured, ensuring depth, rigorous source checking, and comprehensive critical analysis suitable for complex intellectual work.

This skill generates highly structured legal documents, including memos, case summaries, and argument outlines. It utilizes the standard IRAC format (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) to provide comprehensive legal analysis. Ideal for drafting position papers, legal advice summaries, or preparatory documents for court submissions, ensuring all legal arguments are systematically presented and uncertainties are explicitly flagged.

This skill generates clear, plain English communications for patients across various healthcare contexts. It is ideal for drafting patient letters, educational leaflets, discharge summaries, or test results letters. The output targets accessible reading levels (e.g., US Grade 8), ensuring clear instructions and next steps while adhering to plain language guidelines and professional safety warnings.

This guide provides a strategic framework for drafting highly effective and concise author rebuttals for major AI conferences like AAAI. Given strict character limits, no URLs, and no new results, it teaches authors how to triage reviewer feedback, focus on decision-critical factual errors, and maximize impact to improve paper acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide for authors on drafting a strategic response during the OpenReview cycle. This resource covers how to address reviewer objections, shape the Area Chair's meta-review summary, manage the discussion phase, and decide whether to defend the paper or withdraw for a future revision cycle. Focus on clarity, conciseness, and evidence-based arguments.

A comprehensive guide for drafting professional and strategic rebuttals for major academic conferences, such as ACM Multimedia. Learn how to triage reviewer comments, structure arguments for the Area Chair, address factual errors, and incorporate small, confirmatory results while maintaining anonymity and adhering to strict policy guardrails.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising economic policy manuscripts, particularly the abstract and introduction. It teaches authors how to convert complex causal estimates into clear, actionable policy takeaways while adhering to rigorous academic house style, ensuring claims are calibrated and non-overstated.

A comprehensive guide for drafting, polishing, and formatting manuscripts in Agricultural Systems (AgSy). This skill ensures the writing is highly readable for a broad systems-science audience, clearly frames the system contribution, and adheres to demanding journal front-matter requirements (e.g., concise abstracts, Highlights, and graphical abstracts). It focuses on strengthening prose and structure, not generating new content.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting revisions to top-tier academic journals, such as AJPS. It details the strategy, structure, and specific constraints required for the response memorandum following a Revise & Resubmit (R&R) decision. The guide emphasizes addressing every reviewer comment, reconciling conflicting demands, maintaining double-blind anonymity, and ensuring all new analyses are fully reproducible for third-party verification.