Skill UI

This guide helps authors polish the prose and structure of academic accounting manuscripts, particularly for top-tier journal submissions. It emphasizes front-loading the contribution in the introduction, crafting a high-impact abstract, and adopting an active, authoritative 'house voice' that guides the reader immediately to the core finding and its implication.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for polishing academic manuscripts, specifically tailored for submission to top financial journals like The Review of Financial Studies (RFS). It focuses on the late-stage refinement of prose, structuring the abstract and introduction, and ensuring the core research contribution and economic magnitude are immediately legible to the editor and reviewers.

This guide teaches authors how to structure and articulate the core contribution of an economics manuscript, especially for specialized journals like RJE. It provides a four-part framework (Market/Problem, Advance, Method, Lesson) to sharpen the 'so what' message, ensuring the research is legible and impactful to editors and referees, even under strict page limits.

This guide provides comprehensive best practices for structuring tables and figures (exhibits) in empirical finance papers. It addresses the strict 60-page journal limit, advising authors on how to present core findings, identify mechanisms, and display robustness evidence while maintaining readability. Learn how to move mechanical grids to appendices, focus the main body, and ensure every visual element is self-contained and highly interpretable for top-tier referees.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to peer review comments after manuscript revision. It teaches strategies for triaging feedback (Do, Defend, Defer), prioritizing necessary experiments, maintaining a respectful tone, and restructuring the core scientific narrative for high-impact journals. Essential for navigating the academic publishing process.

This skill guides the transformation of empirical findings into generalizable, theoretically robust arguments suitable for top-tier social science publishing. It helps define core social mechanisms, establish scope conditions, and derive testable observable implications across diverse methodologies (e.g., quantitative, comparative, network). Use this when your initial results are strong but the overarching theoretical contribution needs explicit articulation.

This guide outlines best practices for organizing technical conference papers, specifically tailored for venues like ACM SIGCOMM. It details how to separate core arguments (Body), supporting data (Appendices), and citations (References), ensuring the main paper remains self-contained and persuasive to reviewers. Learn how to manage content load, handle extended proofs, and adhere to strict page limits without losing critical information.

A sophisticated guide for social science researchers to transition from empirical evidence (coefficients, fieldwork notes) to robust, theory-driven narrative. It teaches how to structure an argument by identifying the four core components: Actioner, Structural Condition, Mechanism, and Consequence. This method ensures the explanation moves beyond mere correlation to deeply explain *how* and *why* social outcomes are generated or reproduced.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major revisions (R&R) of a sociological theory manuscript. This framework emphasizes that theoretical revision must occur *before* drafting the response letter. It provides a detailed structure for point-by-point replies, managing reviewer conflicts, and ensuring responses are substantive, theoretical arguments rather than mere defenses or cosmetic wording changes. Focus on strengthening the core argument, not just defending it.

This guide provides a strategic framework for authors responding to a Revise-and-Resubmit (R&R) decision for top-tier academic journals. It teaches how to write a comprehensive response letter that addresses diverse reviewer concerns from multiple theoretical traditions (e.g., symbolic interaction, group processes) while protecting the core structure and unique contribution of the paper. Focuses on principled defense, strategic concession, and maintaining scholarly rigor.

This guide helps researchers structure a compelling theoretical argument for social science manuscripts, particularly those in social psychology. It emphasizes elevating mere findings into robust theoretical contributions by explicitly defining the social-psychological mechanism that connects macro social structures, processes, or interactions to individual levels (self, cognition, emotion). It guides users through defining scope conditions, observable implications, and the core structure–individual link.

A comprehensive guide for elevating the logical rigor and conceptual clarity of advanced social science manuscripts. It teaches authors how to explicitly define key concepts, ensure every section directly advances the core proposition, and construct a robust, defensible argumentative chain, particularly useful for theoretical and normative papers.