Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for drafting professional and strategic rebuttals for major academic conferences, such as ACM Multimedia. Learn how to triage reviewer comments, structure arguments for the Area Chair, address factual errors, and incorporate small, confirmatory results while maintaining anonymity and adhering to strict policy guardrails.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for structuring theoretical economics manuscripts for submission to AEJ: Micro. It enforces the theory-first approach, ensuring the introduction immediately presents the economic question and states the main result in words, thus maximizing impact for a broad micro audience. It also covers specific AEA house style conventions, such as reporting standard errors and structuring the abstract.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed specifically for submitting articles to the American Journal of Sociology (AJS) via Editorial Manager. It covers critical, highly specific steps for double-blind review, including separating the cover page, adhering to the AJS house style (not ASA), ensuring required alt text for figures, crafting the ~150-word abstract, and managing the submission fee. Use this guide before final upload to avoid common rejection errors.

This guide outlines the rigorous, multi-step process for authors revising a mathematical or scientific manuscript following a detailed referee report. It emphasizes the critical rule: always fix mathematical gaps and errors in the text first, and only then draft a structured, point-by-point reply that is respectful, precise, and mathematically grounded.

This guide provides a tactical framework for drafting high-stakes author responses (rebuttals) to peer reviews in top-tier academic conferences. It details how to triage reviewer comments (factual errors, questions, disputes), structure the argument within strict word limits (e.g., 800 words), and maintain a professional, evidence-based tone to maximize the paper's chances of acceptance or major revision.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to major academic journals (e.g., American Sociological Review) via platforms like Sage Track. This guide ensures authors meet all technical requirements, including proper anonymity masking, adherence to specific word and length counts, proper formatting (ASA Style Guide), and managing required separate title pages, thereby minimizing avoidable desk-rejects and submission errors.

This comprehensive guide serves as a pre-flight checklist for authors preparing manuscripts for journal submission. It details critical formal requirements, such as strict page limits, mandatory structural elements (e.g., Chinese classification numbers), formula formatting, and adherence to the official submission portal guidelines. Use it to avoid common formatting errors and ensure a smooth initial review process.

A structured guide for vetting academic manuscripts, ensuring the topic aligns with the target journal’s applied modeling mission. It guides researchers through three core checks: real-world management problems, methodological incremental value, and practical decision-making outcomes. It also provides guidance on distinguishing between different academic fields and preventing submission errors.

This comprehensive audit checklist guides authors preparing a paper for the COLT Conference on Learning Theory. It details crucial requirements such as the 12-page PMLR format, single-PDF assembly, and double-anonymous formatting. It helps authors preemptively detect common submission flaws, including parallel-submission violations and formatting errors, ensuring the manuscript meets high academic standards.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with a critical preflight checklist for submitting academic manuscripts to major journals (e.g., SAGE Track). It ensures compliance with strict guidelines, covering anonymization, word count adherence, abstract structure, ORCID linking, and robust data availability statements. Use this tool to minimize the risk of desk rejection due to formatting or procedural errors.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a single-page academic rebuttal after conference reviews (e.g., CVPR). It teaches authors how to strategically address multiple reviews, correct factual errors, and clarify scope within strict formatting and content limitations, focusing on the Area Chair's perspective and emphasizing data over adjectives.

This guide provides best practices for revising academic manuscripts intended for top-tier economics journals, such as the European Economic Review (EER). It teaches authors how to shift their writing focus from highly technical, field-internal jargon to a general-interest, compelling narrative. Learn to structure the introduction with a clear arc, present result-forward abstracts, write actionable research highlights, and properly report findings using standard errors (SEs) rather than significance asterisks.