Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting research papers to ISSTA. It details critical steps such as adhering to ACM sigconf formatting, maintaining the 18-page limit, enforcing double-anonymous review, establishing the artifact plan, and managing HotCRP registration to prevent desk rejection.

This comprehensive router guides researchers through the entire process of developing, analyzing, and submitting a manuscript to the Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE). It provides a structured roadmap, helping users determine the next critical step—from initial topic selection and theory development to advanced econometrics, contribution framing, and final submission preparation. It ensures that the work maintains a rigorous, economics-based argument using archival data, preventing common pitfalls like vague ideas or insufficient identification strategies.

A comprehensive guide for structuring environmental economics manuscripts, specifically tailored for high-impact journals. It teaches authors how to maintain a 'welfare-economics prose' standard, ensuring the crucial link between the environmental problem, the economic mechanism, and the policy implication is clearly and authoritatively presented. This prevents the paper from sounding like advocacy while retaining scientific rigor.

This framework guides the creation of a structured, argumentative literature review, preventing the writing from becoming a mere annotated bibliography. By imposing a unifying taxonomy, model, or question sequence, the author transforms scattered research into a cohesive argument about the field. It helps define the 'spine' of the survey, identifies knowledge gaps, and reconciles apparent contradictions in existing literature.

Provides comprehensive guidelines on structuring and formatting academic exhibits (tables and figures) for international finance and macroeconomics submissions. It ensures that the main findings (headline coefficients) are immediately clear, adhering to best practices for cross-country panels, event studies, and heterogeneity displays.

This guide provides detailed best practices for presenting empirical results, specifically tailored for top-tier economics journals like the QJE. It emphasizes shifting from 'table-heavy' to 'figure-forward' visualization, covering techniques for event-study plots, RDD discontinuity plots, and ensuring all exhibits are self-contained, readable, and follow strict academic formatting standards.

A comprehensive, final preflight checklist designed for submitting scientific manuscripts to top-tier journals. It ensures every critical element—from statistical rigor, data availability, and ethical compliance to formatting, figures, and references—is fully resolved, preventing editorial rejection or major revisions upon initial submission.

This framework guides researchers to evaluate whether their current manuscript meets the high academic standards of top-tier comprehensive journals (e.g., Social Sciences in China). It moves beyond technical sophistication, focusing instead on the depth of intellectual contribution, originality of theory, and the macro-level significance of the research problem, preventing mis-submission and guiding revision strategy.

A comprehensive checklist for authors submitting to academic law journals, specifically tailored for The Yale Law Journal (YLJ). It guides users through critical pre-upload steps, including mandatory anonymization checks, adhering to strict length caps (Article, Essay, Forum), verifying Bluebook citation apparatus, and ensuring the use of the official submission portal. This tool helps prevent common submission failures before the final upload.

A rigorous framework to prevent confident fabrication (hallucination) by treating competence as an evidence boundary. It guides users to classify claims—Grounded, Partial, or Ungrounded—based on verifiable sources. It mandates assessing the cost of wrongness before answering, fetching, or abstaining, ensuring that assertions are always backed by sufficient evidence.

A structured framework based on the Cynefin model to classify problems by their underlying cause-effect domain (Clear, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic). It guides users on selecting the correct response mode and methodology before attempting solutions, preventing failure due to domain mismatch. Useful when unsure how to approach novel or mixed problems.

This advanced skill provides end-to-end management for external local counsel on multi-jurisdiction legal matters. It guides the entire process—from firm selection and engagement setup (including instruction design) through performance monitoring, scope enforcement, and relationship escalation. The focus is on the coordination discipline of Legal Project Management (LPM) to prevent common failure modes like scope creep and ambiguous instructions.