Skill UI

Enforces a verification-first routine: identify the proving command, rerun it fully, inspect the output, and cite its evidence before claiming tests, builds, or tasks are complete; keeps handoffs honest and avoids false satisfaction.

Guide VP/CPO transitions through a 30-60-90-day diagnostic onboarding that emphasizes learning, evidence gathering, and phased decisions instead of premature execution.

This tutor specializes in developing advanced critical thinking and argumentative skills across humanities and social sciences. It covers disciplines including philosophy, sociology, psychology, political science, and literature. Instead of providing simple answers, the focus is on teaching students how to construct nuanced, evidence-based arguments, utilize multiple theoretical frameworks (e.g., Marxist, feminist), engage in close textual reading, and master the structure of academic writing, supporting both Chinese and Western academic traditions.

An evidence-based coach providing guidance on fundamental wellness pillars: sleep hygiene, nutrition, exercise, and stress management. It uses behavior change science and motivational interviewing principles to help users build sustainable, lasting health habits. This tool is educational and motivational, designed to support general wellness journeys, and always emphasizes the critical need to consult healthcare professionals for diagnosis or treatment.

This skill transforms the AI into a coach for rigorous, systematic thinking. It helps users analyze arguments, detect logical fallacies (like ad hominem or false dilemma), recognize cognitive biases, and evaluate the credibility of evidence and sources. It provides a framework for developing deep reasoning skills necessary for navigating misinformation and complex real-world issues.

This skill provides a robust, systematic framework for evaluating the rigor of scientific claims and research studies. It guides users in assessing experimental design validity, detecting various biases (selection, confounding, publication), and evaluating statistical evidence. By applying established grading standards like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias, it is essential for conducting systematic literature reviews, peer reviews, and deep scientific critical analysis.

A comprehensive mentor guiding users through the entire lifecycle of academic literature reviews. It teaches systematic search strategies (PICO/PCC), critical appraisal methods, and advanced synthesis techniques. The skill covers searching major English and Chinese databases (e.g., PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI), organizing findings, and effectively utilizing AI research tools like Elicit and Semantic Scholar to build robust, evidence-based research papers.

A meta-orchestrator designed for compliance teams to manage complex, multi-jurisdictional compliance programs. It automatically selects applicable regulatory frameworks (e.g., ISO 27001, GDPR, EU AI Act, HIPAA), computes control overlap across standards, simulates mock audits, and consolidates evidence into a unified reuse map. Ideal for planning annual audits or achieving multi-certification.

This framework serves as a rigorous thought partner, designed to challenge underlying assumptions, separate raw evidence from interpretation, and ensure that all conclusions are fully defensible. It guides users to define clear decision goals, test counterfactuals, and calibrate claims strictly to the available data quality. Ideal for high-stakes projects where the cost of error is significant.

This agent provides a critical framework for navigating corporate environments, contrasting internal jargon and process visibility (Ding In) with objective, real-world evidence and user experience (Ding Out). It helps users move beyond subjective 'feelings' or polished reports, structuring complex tasks into verifiable components: Goal, Acceptance Criteria, Action, Evidence, and Risk. Ideal for project management, status reporting, and critical thinking in a corporate setting.

A rigorous protocol for Chinese-canonical structural diagnosis of complex systems, organizations, or public disputes. It mandates separating facts, evidence, scale, and responsibility through a multi-stage internal reasoning process, ensuring deep structural integrity and comprehensive review before drawing conclusions.

This specialized skill guides the creation of long-form structural critical essays and detailed academic dossiers, primarily for Chinese academic contexts. It utilizes the CrossFrame methodology to first establish a foundational structure, define evidence boundaries, and identify key mechanisms, before applying a critical matrix. The output is highly structured, ensuring depth, rigorous source checking, and comprehensive critical analysis suitable for complex intellectual work.