Skill UI

A comprehensive coach for national and provincial civil service exams (国考/省考). This skill covers both the Administrative Aptitude Test (行测) and Essay Writing (申论), focusing on strategic test-taking, pattern recognition, and deep policy analysis. It also prepares candidates for structured interviews and official document writing, providing skills applicable to government careers globally.

A comprehensive system designed to master all major interview formats globally. It simulates mock interviews, coaching behavioral skills (STAR method), technical problem-solving, and consulting case studies. The coach provides culturally calibrated advice for specific contexts, including Chinese civil service exams, state-owned enterprise interviews, and major tech company assessments, ensuring users are prepared for any professional challenge.

This skill guides users through structured, adaptive learning experiences for any topic. It diagnoses the user's current knowledge level and goal to create a personalized study path. It utilizes techniques like worked examples, retrieval questions, and spaced repetition to ensure deep understanding, making it ideal for self-study, skill acquisition, or subject review.

This skill is designed to review Chinese skill documentation to ensure it meets publishing standards. It systematically checks the clarity of descriptions and the executability of process steps, providing structured feedback in Chinese while maintaining necessary machine enumeration values for technical integrity.

A guide for authors needing to precisely position their theoretical contribution against existing literature. It teaches how to identify the 'delta'—the exact difference (e.g., weaker assumption, new environment, full characterization)—relative to the single closest academic result, rather than making vague claims about the field as a whole.

This skill guides authors on how to position their manuscript within the complex, multidisciplinary literature of Agricultural Systems (AgSy). It ensures that the paper advances the conversation by engaging both the domain knowledge and the core modeling/systems methodologies. The process focuses on identifying unresolved systemic trade-offs, pinpointing the exact research gap, and clearly articulating the unique contribution among established alternatives.

This guide provides a detailed architectural framework for writing long-form art-historical essays. It teaches writers how to structure their argument by leading with the core problem and thesis, integrating visual evidence (figures) exactly where the prose requires it, and maintaining strict discipline over word count and endnotes. Essential for transforming a rambling draft into a clear, scholarly argument.

This skill guides the rigorous process of building and auditing dense legal footnote apparatus, specifically for Harvard Law Review (HLR) standards. It ensures every proposition is supported by the cited source at the exact page, verifies quote accuracy, and prepares a verifiable source file, making the submission 'pull-ready' for demanding academic review.

This guide provides expert advice on structuring the literature review for top-tier finance journals (e.g., JFE). It teaches authors to move beyond simple chronological listing, instead mapping the core academic debates, pinpointing the exact boundaries of the closest existing work, and articulating concrete, theoretically motivated gaps that the new research fills. This is essential for convincing domain experts of novel contribution.

A comprehensive guide designed to help researchers target specific academic journals, using the Central University of Finance and Economics (CUFE) Journal as a primary example. It provides deep insights into the journal's scope, required structure, common acceptance criteria, and high-risk rejection areas for economics and management manuscripts. This skill helps users frame, revise, and optimize their papers for optimal publication fit.

A comprehensive guide for revising technical submissions, particularly in computational linguistics and NLP. It details how to enforce linguistic scope discipline, present examples as verifiable arguments, structure the first page for maximum impact, anticipate reviewer limitations, and maintain strict terminology consistency for high-stakes academic publishing.

A comprehensive skill for assessing whether a neuroscience manuscript meets the exacting standards of a top-tier journal. It guides authors through evaluating the conceptual advance, mandatory multi-level integration (molecular to behavioral), the necessity of causal intervention, and adhering to strict structural and methodological requirements (e.g., STAR Methods, data availability). Ideal for researchers aiming to refine their work before submission.