Skill UI

This skill provides expert guidance on evaluating academic manuscripts, particularly those in auditing, accounting, and economics. It helps users determine the suitability of their work for specific, high-level journals (e.g., Auditing and Economics Research). It covers journal positioning, required methodology, structural requirements, common rejection pitfalls, and strategic advice for revision or resubmission.

A structured guide for vetting academic manuscripts, ensuring the topic aligns with the target journal’s applied modeling mission. It guides researchers through three core checks: real-world management problems, methodological incremental value, and practical decision-making outcomes. It also provides guidance on distinguishing between different academic fields and preventing submission errors.

A specialized tool designed to guide authors in drafting professional and structured rebuttal letters for academic journals, particularly those in Public Administration. It provides detailed templates and guidance for addressing reviewer comments, focusing specifically on strengthening theoretical frameworks and justifying methodological fits to meet high academic standards.

Detailed guidance for authors submitting to top-tier academic journals (especially in Criminology) that require a Revise-and-Resubmit (R&R). This guide teaches authors how to structure a professional response letter, reconcile conflicting interdisciplinary reviewer demands, and strategically defend the paper's core theoretical contribution while ensuring scientific rigor and reproducibility.

This skill guides researchers on selecting and positioning their academic paper for the journal *Computer Science*. It helps determine if a topic fits the journal's broad, multi-disciplinary scope, identifies the correct column (e.g., AI, Software), and advises on the appropriate paper type (review, research, application). It also provides strategic guidance on comparing it with other specialized journals, making it ideal for pre-drafting planning.

This guide outlines the proper placement of various research materials—including proofs, code, and extended results—within major academic conference submissions. It helps authors understand which content must be presented in the main body, which belongs in appendices, and how to correctly manage supplementary manuscripts and code/data supplements to maximize the chance of reviewer acceptance.

This skill guide is designed for researchers and academics submitting manuscripts to specialized journals in economics and management. It helps users analyze a target journal's specific scope, required theoretical perspectives (e.g., institutional economics, political economy), and structural demands. It provides guidance on manuscript revision, identifying high-risk areas for rejection, and suggesting alternative suitable venues.

This guide outlines the rigorous standards for writing top-tier distributed systems conference papers. It details the mandatory narrative arc—moving from an operational pain point to a named design principle—and emphasizes that every claim must be supported by precise, measured evidence (e.g., percentiles and specific workloads) rather than relying on superlatives or vague adjectives. It also provides guidance on structuring the argument, budgeting page space, and designing figures as core evidence.

Provides expert guidance on structuring scholarly essays for major academic publications like PMLA. It helps writers organize complex arguments, ensuring a clear, compelling flow from problem statement to conclusion for a generalist academic readership. Essential for outlining or reorganizing sprawling drafts while adhering to strict word counts (6,000–9,000 words).

This skill guides the structure and prose for drafting high-level integrative reviews, particularly for publications like the Psychological Bulletin. It ensures the manuscript moves beyond descriptive annotation to become a rigorous, evaluative synthesis. Users must comply with APA 7th edition style and specific reporting standards (MARS for meta-analyses, PRISMA for systematic reviews, and JARS for quantitative work). It provides detailed guidance on structuring the abstract (≤ 250 words), the method section, results, and discussion to meet expert reviewer expectations.

This auxiliary skill helps researchers assess the suitability of their academic manuscripts in economics, social science, or management for submission to high-level journals like 'Reform of Economic System'. It provides comprehensive guidance on journal positioning, required theoretical depth, appropriate methodology, structural requirements, and common pitfalls, helping authors significantly improve their submission readiness and increase acceptance chances.

This guide helps researchers determine the most appropriate venue (e.g., SIGMETRICS, NSDI, IMC, NeurIPS) for their computer systems performance evaluation research. It emphasizes that contributions must be rigorous performance-evaluation results—such as proven models, principled measurements, or guaranteed learning algorithms—rather than merely built systems or pure network measurements.