Skill UI

This skill enhances AI responses by simulating the inner monologue and self-correction process of a human being. It moves beyond standard helpful assistance by incorporating three stages: Self (raw instinct), Mirror (critical reflection), and Conscious Response (the polished, human-like output). Ideal for emotional support, personal advice, or writing that requires authentic emotional depth and a distinct point of view, rather than purely factual or structured data.

This mode acts as a structured thinking partner, guiding users through ambiguous problems, complex decisions, and open-ended strategy questions. Instead of providing direct answers, it focuses on challenging assumptions, asking clarifying questions, surfacing multiple perspectives (e.g., stakeholder views), and helping the user structure their thought process using advanced techniques like reframing, pre-mortem analysis, and identifying critical constraints. Ideal for product managers and leaders who need to explore ideas without a clear path forward.

A rigorous protocol for Chinese-canonical structural diagnosis of complex systems, organizations, or public disputes. It mandates separating facts, evidence, scale, and responsibility through a multi-stage internal reasoning process, ensuring deep structural integrity and comprehensive review before drawing conclusions.

Provides a comprehensive, structured guide for managing redundancy processes, covering both individual and collective consultations. It includes templates for at-risk letters, consultation meeting scripts, and final confirmation letters. The content is heavily focused on UK employment law, and repeatedly emphasizes that qualified legal and HR advice must be sought before any action is taken.

A comprehensive guide detailing the double-blind three-review process for academic journals. It breaks down the complete workflow—from initial submission and editor screening to external review, multiple revision rounds, and final acceptance. The guide provides authors with actionable advice on preparing for each stage, managing expectations, and avoiding common procedural pitfalls.

This skill guides users through the process of assessing if their academic manuscript aligns with the scope and standards of *Accounting and Economics Research*. It covers journal positioning, required structure (abstract, citations), methodological rigor, and common pitfalls, helping researchers optimize their writing for specific academic venues.

A comprehensive guide detailing the intensive and rigorous peer-review standards of The American Historical Review (AHR). It covers the double-blind review process, the expectations of six or more scholars, the timeline, and the critical elements historians must include—such as historiographical intervention and source criticism—to increase a manuscript's chances of acceptance. Ideal for academics preparing submissions to top-tier history journals.

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous review process of major academic journals, using the American Anthropologist (AA) as a model. Learn about editorial screening, the requirements for four-field significance, anonymous peer review, and incorporating an ethics of care framework. This tool helps authors structure their manuscripts to anticipate and mitigate common rejection pitfalls.

This sophisticated workflow orchestrator is designed for authors submitting manuscripts to *American Anthropologist*. It acts as a guide, routing the user through the necessary stages—from initial idea selection and literature positioning to theory building and ethical review. It ensures the final work maintains a required anthropological breadth, integrating reflexivity and ethics of care throughout the writing process.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the rigorous submission process for the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ). It covers crucial details such as double-blind anonymization, AOM house-style formatting (Times New Roman 12pt, double-spaced), ethical declarations (AI disclosure, IRB), and adherence to the ScholarOne portal requirements. Use this guide before finalizing your submission.

This comprehensive skill guides authors through the rigorous submission process for Angewandte Chemie International Edition. It provides detailed criteria covering scientific scope, required novelty, evidentiary standards for claims (mechanistic, physical), structural formatting, and common desk-reject triggers, ensuring manuscripts meet the journal's high academic bar.

This guide provides a comprehensive deep dive into the rigorous academic review process of the American Political Science Review (APSR). It details the mechanics of double-anonymous review, the three primary grounds for desk-rejection (remit, ethics, substance), and the strategic implications of various decision categories. It is essential for authors to pre-empt failure modes and structure their work for maximum acceptance chances before submission.