Skill UI

This comprehensive guide details the strict academic formatting required for submitting art historical articles, particularly for journals adhering to The Chicago Manual of Style. It covers the use of CMOS endnotes (not footnotes), precise descriptive prose, and mandatory, structured formatting for captions, credit lines, and figure references.

This guide provides expert knowledge on the history, etymology, and correct modern usage of the em dash (—). It covers various punctuation marks—including commas, semicolons, and colons—and offers specific guidelines on when to use them in professional writing, technical documentation, and code comments. It emphasizes adapting punctuation rules for different media types.

This guide offers advanced methodological advice for structuring the 'Related Work' section for top-tier theoretical computer science conferences (like FOCS). It teaches researchers how to treat research history as 'lineage engineering,' requiring precise citation of specific preprints (arXiv version pinning), distinguishing between conference and journal versions, and transparently addressing concurrent results. This ensures the bibliography is rigorous, consistent, and withstands expert review.

This guide determines if a scholarly manuscript aligns with the scope of *History and Theory*, a leading venue for the philosophy of history and historical theory. It emphasizes that accepted submissions must contain an original theoretical or methodological argument, rather than merely being an empirical case study. Use this resource to frame, re-check, or select the appropriate academic venue for your advanced research.

This guide helps authors determine if their academic essay—focused on the theory, method, or history of literary study—is appropriate for high-level theoretical journals like New Literary History. It emphasizes developing original theoretical or methodological questions, re-framing existing readings, and understanding the rigorous academic bar required for publication in the humanities.

A comprehensive guide on structuring the 'Related Work' section for top-tier Information Retrieval (IR) conferences (like SIGIR). Learn to trace the lineage of your research through canonical history (e.g., BM25, ColBERT), mechanically articulate your technical 'delta' (novel contribution), and avoid common pitfalls like venue misattribution and insufficient contrast.

This comprehensive skill guides authors submitting research to The Burlington Magazine. It outlines the rigorous academic standards required for object-based art history, focusing on connoisseurship, attribution, and provenance. It ensures manuscripts are tightly argued using primary source evidence, technical findings, and close visual examination, helping authors align their work with the journal's specific evidentiary bar and house style.

This skill guides authors on whether their British, European, or world history manuscript is appropriate for The English Historical Review (EHR). It details the journal's high standards for archival and empirical rigor, primary source command, historiographical placement, and formatting requirements (Chicago house style, double-blind review). Use this to check fit, refine arguments, and avoid common academic pitfalls.

This skill provides an expert evaluation framework for manuscripts concerning modern European history. It assesses whether a deep archival study possesses the necessary interpretive significance and historiographical intervention required by leading academic journals, such as The Journal of Modern History. Use it to refine scope, check scholarly rigor, and prepare for high-stakes academic submissions.

This comprehensive skill guides authors on submitting manuscripts to The Journal of Roman Studies (JRS). It outlines JRS's core expectation: an original argument built directly on primary evidence (inscriptions, texts, artifacts, etc.). It covers disciplinary standards for Roman history, archaeology, epigraphy, and literature, ensuring submissions are appropriately framed and methodologically sound before actual submission.

This guide helps scholars assess if their social, economic, or cultural history manuscript aligns with the rigorous, problem-driven standards of Past & Present. It instructs authors on framing their research around a core "big question"—a genuine historical problem—ensuring comparative significance, adhering to historiographical expectations, and meeting specific academic standards like double-blind review and Chicago style.