Skill UI

A comprehensive checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE). It guides users through critical pre-submission steps, including single-blind formatting, confirming the required US$100 fee, adhering to Chicago author-date style, and ensuring data replication readiness. Use this guide for the final review before pressing submit.

A comprehensive guide for revising academic manuscripts for top-tier law and economics journals. It teaches authors how to restructure the introduction and abstract to follow the law-and-economics arc, ensuring the prose is plain, direct, and seamlessly integrates legal doctrines with rigorous economic analysis for a dual audience.

A comprehensive strategy guide designed for researchers submitting papers in institutional or organizational economics. It teaches how to anticipate specialized referee objections—such as selection bias, endogeneity, or scope—before submission, ensuring the manuscript is robustly positioned for top-tier journals.

A comprehensive guide on structuring robustness checks for academic papers, particularly for Law, Economics, and Organization journals. Instead of simply listing additional tables, this method teaches how to organize checks by specific theoretical threats (selection bias, endogeneity, measurement error, alternative mechanisms) to strengthen the core institutional claim and anticipate referee criticism.

A comprehensive checklist designed for authors preparing a manuscript for submission to the Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO). This guide ensures adherence to Oxford University Press (OUP) standards, covering formatting, anonymization rules, conflict of interest disclosures, data availability statements, and replication package readiness before uploading to the Editorial Express portal.

This tool acts as a comprehensive workflow router for researchers targeting The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO). It guides users through the entire academic process, from initial topic selection and literature positioning to developing models, ensuring robustness, and handling revision and rebuttal stages. It helps diagnose current bottlenecks and determines the optimal next specialized skill to use.

This guide helps authors refine academic prose for institutional and organizational economics journals. It teaches how to structure the narrative to open with an institutional puzzle, clearly name the underlying mechanism, and frame the contribution as a delta on a specific frontier, ensuring the focus remains on governance and organizational forms rather than just data or models.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to top-tier journals like the Journal of Marketing. It details the crucial steps for planning, executing, and drafting a point-by-point rebuttal letter following a major revision request (R&R). The guide emphasizes prioritizing the Coeditor's concerns regarding substantive novelty, managerial relevance, and identification strength, ensuring the response is structured, anonymous, and highly persuasive.

This guide helps researchers sharpen and validate their research questions to ensure they meet the rigorous standards of top marketing journals (like JM). It focuses on testing for substantive importance, dual relevance (bridging theory and practice), and overall fit, helping users differentiate if their work belongs in JM, JMR, Marketing Science, or elsewhere. It emphasizes an empirics-first approach.

This guide teaches authors how to precisely position their academic contribution within existing specialized literature, particularly in finance and banking. It moves beyond vague claims by anchoring the work to canonical economic mechanisms and distinguishing the specific 'delta' (new shocks, frictions, or datasets). Mastering this skill ensures the manuscript clearly articulates its unique value and policy relevance to experts.

A comprehensive guide for academics preparing manuscripts for top-tier journals (e.g., JMCB). It helps authors anticipate specialized critiques from monetary, banking, and structural economists by identifying predictable weaknesses, strengthening the core arguments, and pre-emptively addressing common methodological and scope-related objections before official submission.

A comprehensive guide for economists and researchers on determining if their work concerning monetary policy, banking, credit, or macro-finance is a suitable fit for the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB). It teaches how to structure arguments, identify clear policy stakes, and differentiate the unique scope of JMCB from similar academic outlets.