Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) management within Quality Management Systems (QMS), specifically tailored for medical devices. It covers the entire investigation lifecycle, including root cause analysis (RCA) using methodologies like 5-Why and Fishbone diagrams, developing robust corrective actions, and verifying effectiveness to ensure continuous compliance and quality improvement.

A structured system designed to extract the cognitive fingerprint of any text's author. Utilizing the DHDNA framework, it analyzes 12 dimensions—such as Analytical Depth, Emotional Processing, and Strategic Thinking—to provide deep insights into the author's unique reasoning patterns, decision-making style, and overall cognitive signature. Ideal for content analysis, psychological profiling, and understanding underlying thought processes.

A multi-phase workflow designed to guide users through complex problem analysis and solution design. Instead of providing immediate answers, it systematically enforces deep thinking by reviewing the problem's validity, assessing information gaps, performing root cause analysis, and iterating through solution vetting (self-check and final review). Ideal for complex technical troubleshooting, decision-making, or theoretical discussions requiring rigorous methodology.

This specialized skill guides the creation of long-form structural critical essays and detailed academic dossiers, primarily for Chinese academic contexts. It utilizes the CrossFrame methodology to first establish a foundational structure, define evidence boundaries, and identify key mechanisms, before applying a critical matrix. The output is highly structured, ensuring depth, rigorous source checking, and comprehensive critical analysis suitable for complex intellectual work.

This skill is designed for generating structured, insightful, and boundary-aware short answers, such as reader replies, editor responses, or consultation advice. It structures analysis by defining fact boundaries, providing structural judgment, offering necessary critique, and suggesting safe, low-risk next steps. It is primarily activated by the CrossFrame Suite, ensuring the output maintains a canonical Chinese semantic layer while providing professional, actionable advice.

This skill serves as the central workflow router for manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Sociology (AJS). It guides authors through the entire academic lifecycle, from initial topic selection and theoretical framing to research design, data analysis, and final submission/rebuttal. It helps authors determine the appropriate next step based on the manuscript type (research article, comment, reply) and current stage, ensuring the work meets AJS's high standard for theoretical ambition and sociological dialogue.

This skill guides the stress-testing of theoretical manuscripts by focusing purely on logical coherence. It helps authors develop robust arguments by verifying proposition chains, running counterfactual thought experiments, addressing rival theories, and identifying disconfirming cases. It ensures the internal consistency and rigor of a theory, independent of empirical data analysis.

This guide outlines the rigorous methodology for developing theoretical arguments, specifically for top-tier academic journals. It focuses on the 'craft of theory construction'—defining necessary constructs, deriving relationships, specifying underlying mechanisms, and setting boundary conditions. It is a conceptual framework tool, not an empirical data analysis method, helping researchers elevate the rigor of their theoretical contributions.

A comprehensive guide for authors facing a revise-and-resubmit (R&R) status in academic journals. It outlines the entire revision lifecycle, from building a structured response matrix and performing substantive re-analysis (re-coding, new experiments) to strategically drafting the point-by-point rebuttal letter. Focuses on maintaining academic rigor, reconciling conflicting reviews, and ensuring methodological consistency before final resubmission.

This framework guides the creation of high-impact academic literature reviews, transforming a mere annotated bibliography into a cohesive, argumentative essay. It helps researchers impose a unifying 'spine'—such as a taxonomy, process model, or levels of analysis—to make complex psychological fields legible and accessible to non-specialist readers. Ideal for synthesizing scattered research into a single, powerful argument.

This guide outlines the rigorous methodology of 'close looking' crucial for academic art writing, particularly for Art Bulletin articles. It teaches how to move beyond mere description by systematically analyzing composition, facture, medium, and scale. Every visual claim must be supported by reproducible evidence, such as numbered figures or detail crops, ensuring the argument is grounded in verifiable observation, not mere assertion.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for developing and reporting high-stakes academic analyses, particularly in the social sciences and anthropology. It teaches authors how to ground every interpretive claim in specific evidence, proactively address alternative readings, integrate disconfirming data, and maintain methodological transparency to ensure the work survives rigorous expert peer review.