Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for assessing whether a research manuscript is a good fit for the Journal of Management Studies (JMS). It helps authors structure their work, understand the journal's theory-development focus, and navigate criteria like methodological rigor, theoretical positioning, and house style, ensuring submissions maximize their chance of acceptance in top-tier management venues.

This comprehensive guide assists researchers in structuring their academic contributions for policy-focused journals. It teaches authors how to identify and frame the 'decision gap'—the crucial question policymakers need answered—by bridging research across economics, political science, and public management. It ensures the contribution is framed as policy-relevant, not just methodologically novel.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for researchers to pressure-test whether their public administration project is suitable for the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART). It emphasizes contributing to or testing public-management theory rather than merely presenting policy findings, helping users refine research questions and determine the most appropriate academic venue (JPART, PAR, JPAM, Governance).

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the Management Science (MS) journal. It helps authors assess if their quantitative work (spanning operations, finance, IS, marketing, etc.) meets the journal's high, interdisciplinary rigor. It acts as a pre-submission checklist, advising on department selection, framing the contribution, and avoiding common desk-reject pitfalls.

This guide teaches researchers how to structure and articulate the contribution of a mathematical finance manuscript. It advises authors to move beyond simply proving a theorem, instead focusing on framing the methodological novelty and its direct payoff to financial modeling problems like pricing, hedging, risk management, and portfolio choice. It ensures the paper is seen as relevant to practitioners, not just mathematicians.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to Major Revision (R&R) decisions from top-tier academic journals. It teaches how to structure the rebuttal letter, prioritize the Department Editor's key concerns, address specific analytical and empirical objections, and ensure the revision adheres to strict formatting constraints (page caps, double-anonymization, data disclosure).

This guide details the complex, multi-stage review process for high-level academic journals, such as Management Science. It explains critical stages like department-specific desk screening, double-anonymous refereeing, and assessing cross-departmental fit. It is essential for authors who need to understand how submissions are evaluated, interpret rejection letters (e.g., fit vs. rigor), and plan their next steps for revision or re-aiming.

This tool guides the refinement of academic prose, specifically for submissions to Management Science (INFORMS). It focuses on transforming notation-dense text into clear, impactful, and highly readable manuscripts. Key practices include front-loading the core results, translating complex symbols into plain language intuition, and adopting a style suitable for a broad, cross-departmental academic audience.

Provides rigorous guidelines for structuring and writing high-quality academic literature reviews, specifically tailored for journals like Management World. It mandates a unique three-layer dialogue structure (international context, local Chinese research, and original contribution), addressing issues like language source imbalance or lack of scholarly dialogue. Covers precise ratios for Chinese and English sources, and integration with national policy narratives.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for authors submitting manuscripts to top-tier academic journals, such as Management World. It guides users through critical checks on formatting, double-blind compliance, reference standards, word count, and required supplementary materials. Use this guide to ensure your paper meets strict technical requirements and avoid early rejection during the initial review phase.

A guide for structuring the discussion section of academic papers, moving beyond mere result restatement. It teaches how to theoretically advance existing management theories by demonstrating extension, defining boundary conditions, or achieving theoretical integration, ensuring the paper closes the gap established in the introduction.

This guide provides a structured framework for authors aiming to submit manuscripts to Nature Geoscience. It details how to comply with strict journal limits on word count, display items, and references. By implementing a triage order—such as moving protocols to Online Methods and extended data to Supplementary Information—authors can ensure the main text remains focused, concise, and impactful.