Skill UI

This skill guide teaches the specialized rhetorical and structural requirements for writing comprehensive academic reviews, particularly for high-impact fields like Sociology. It ensures the prose is authoritative, highly accessible to non-specialists, logically signposted, and culminates in a concrete, forward-looking research agenda, moving beyond simple summary.

This guide details the rigorous double-blind peer review process used by major art history journals. It helps authors understand what expert referees and editors focus on—such as the originality of the argument, close visual analysis, and documentary evidence—to pre-empt common objections and significantly improve manuscript quality before submission. It emphasizes mastering academic standards and anonymity protocols.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complete academic review pipeline for IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering (ASE) submissions. It explains unique stages like the early-rejection gate, the criteria-bound revision process, and the difference between ASE's cycle and those of peer conferences (e.g., ICSE, FSE). Essential reading for authors aiming to submit high-quality research in automatic software engineering.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising academic papers for the ACM CHI conference. It provides detailed instructions on structuring explicit contribution statements, calibrating claims, ethically handling participant quotes, and ensuring accessibility for mixed-expertise review juries. Essential for those submitting research in HCI and related fields.

This guide details the rigorous process of revising academic manuscripts for top-tier scholarly journals. It provides a structured strategy for authors to respond to editor and reviewer feedback, emphasizing strengthening the central intervention, addressing every comment point-by-point, and reconciling conflicting scholarly opinions while maintaining academic rigor.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with detailed standards for preparing high-quality, publishable scientific manuscripts for the Chinese Journal of Computers (CJC). It covers critical academic elements, including writing the four-element reporting abstract, structuring the narrative (Introduction, Methods, Experiments), maintaining consistent terminology and symbols, adhering to Chinese legislative units, and mastering the GB/T 7714 citation format. It ensures the final submission meets the rigorous linguistic and structural demands of top-tier academic journals.

A comprehensive protocol for authors addressing major referee objections in theoretical econometrics papers. This guide teaches systematic revision techniques, including how to categorize critiques (fundamental gaps, clarifications, disagreements), structure the mathematical proofs, and write a rigorous, point-by-point rebuttal letter. It ensures the response is mathematically precise and academically sound.

This guide provides expert knowledge on the history, etymology, and correct modern usage of the em dash (—). It covers various punctuation marks—including commas, semicolons, and colons—and offers specific guidelines on when to use them in professional writing, technical documentation, and code comments. It emphasizes adapting punctuation rules for different media types.

A comprehensive guide detailing the multi-stage academic conference paper review process, such as EMNLP's two-stage pipeline. It covers strategic elements like understanding the difference between Soundness and Excitement scores, optimizing the author response for the Area Chair's meta-review, and managing resubmission dynamics to maximize acceptance chances.

This guide details the rigorous, multi-stage peer review process for Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL). It covers everything from the initial subject-editor desk screening (evaluating significance and fit) to the specialized technical audits performed by expert referees in intersecting sub-fields. Use this to stress-test your manuscript pre-submission, anticipate potential weaknesses, and strategize responses to reviewers' critiques, significantly hardening your paper for high-impact academic publication.

This comprehensive guide provides a detailed preflight checklist for submitting academic manuscripts to top-tier journals. It covers crucial guidelines such as implementing double-blind anonymization, adhering to specific author rules (co-authorship, affiliations), structuring the abstract, and mastering the Author-Date citation style. Use this guide to ensure your submission meets all official academic standards and maximizes acceptance chances.

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for navigating the rigorous developmental review cycle of top-tier academic journals. It teaches users how to interpret complex decision letters (Desk Reject, Major R&R), identify binding concerns from both editors and reviewers, and strategically determine if a revision effort is worthwhile before resubmission.