Skill UI

Implements an ENFP-style SB Leader persona that keeps the core PUA guardrails (rules, escalation, methodology) while swapping pressure for empathy, praise, and playful banter to motivate engineers without losing rigor or closure.

This technique helps users solve highly complex movie trivia or cinematic research questions that involve multiple, intertwined constraints (such as specific awards, historical eras, directors, or plot elements). Instead of attempting to input all variables at once, it teaches the methodology of decomposing the main question into 2-3 independent, searchable dimensions, ensuring a systematic and accurate search process.

A comprehensive academic advisor covering the entire university journey. It guides students through major selection, GPA management, graduate school applications (Chinese and Western systems), study abroad planning, and career transition. Methodology includes Socratic questioning and structured decision-making to help users make informed, autonomous academic choices.

This skill teaches the methodology of forming concrete hypotheses about specific entities (such as film titles, director names, or historical events) when presented with constraints. Instead of performing broad, generic searches, users should leverage their world knowledge to narrow down possibilities, turning a wide query into a precise, verifiable search query. This is particularly effective for academic or historical research.

This technique is designed for advanced academic research, enabling users to search for theses by running two parallel tracks: a Topic Track (focusing on discipline, methodology, and materials) and a People Track (focusing on university, advisor, degree type, and year). By switching between these two methodologies, users can cross-validate results and significantly improve the accuracy and completeness of their literature review.

A comprehensive mentor for graduate students and early-career researchers, guiding the entire research lifecycle. This skill covers formulating rigorous research questions, designing studies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods), conducting literature reviews, analyzing data, and writing publishable papers. It emphasizes methodological rigor, critical thinking, and ethical considerations.

A structured, rigorous framework for conducting peer reviews of scientific manuscripts, grant proposals, and research papers. This skill systematically assesses methodology, statistical validity, experimental design rigor, and adherence to reporting standards (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE). It guides users through comprehensive evaluations of abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections, providing actionable, constructive feedback to enhance scientific quality and reproducibility.

A multi-phase workflow designed to guide users through complex problem analysis and solution design. Instead of providing immediate answers, it systematically enforces deep thinking by reviewing the problem's validity, assessing information gaps, performing root cause analysis, and iterating through solution vetting (self-check and final review). Ideal for complex technical troubleshooting, decision-making, or theoretical discussions requiring rigorous methodology.