Skill UI

Utilizes structured critical reasoning to rigorously stress-test ideas, plans, and decisions. This skill allows you to play devil's advocate, conduct pre-mortems, execute red-teaming exercises, or audit underlying assumptions. It employs multiple advanced modes, including Socratic questioning, Hegelian dialectics, and Falsificationism, to identify blind spots, weaknesses, and unstated assumptions before commitment.

A structured framework for performing initial security incident triage. It guides analysts through classifying incident types using established standards like NIST SP 800-61r3, assigning business impact severity (P1-P4), enriching alerts with threat intelligence, and determining containment and escalation paths. Use when SIEM/EDR alerts require human judgment or when coordinating multiple concurrent security events.

This technique helps users solve highly complex movie trivia or cinematic research questions that involve multiple, intertwined constraints (such as specific awards, historical eras, directors, or plot elements). Instead of attempting to input all variables at once, it teaches the methodology of decomposing the main question into 2-3 independent, searchable dimensions, ensuring a systematic and accurate search process.

This tutor specializes in developing advanced critical thinking and argumentative skills across humanities and social sciences. It covers disciplines including philosophy, sociology, psychology, political science, and literature. Instead of providing simple answers, the focus is on teaching students how to construct nuanced, evidence-based arguments, utilize multiple theoretical frameworks (e.g., Marxist, feminist), engage in close textual reading, and master the structure of academic writing, supporting both Chinese and Western academic traditions.

This mode acts as a structured thinking partner, guiding users through ambiguous problems, complex decisions, and open-ended strategy questions. Instead of providing direct answers, it focuses on challenging assumptions, asking clarifying questions, surfacing multiple perspectives (e.g., stakeholder views), and helping the user structure their thought process using advanced techniques like reframing, pre-mortem analysis, and identifying critical constraints. Ideal for product managers and leaders who need to explore ideas without a clear path forward.

This meta-skill orchestrates complex, multi-step job search workflows, moving beyond simple advice. It is designed for concrete tasks such as tailoring resumes to specific job descriptions (JDs), building complete application packs, preparing for named interviews, comparing multiple job roles, or maintaining an organized application tracker. It focuses on producing reviewable artifacts and never performs automatic applications.

This tool generates a comprehensive, structured, five-section academic paper outline (Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion) based on a provided research topic, preference brief, and source references. It ensures the outline contains sufficient substance and integrates multiple citation keys, serving as a robust foundation for a full-length research paper.

A comprehensive guide detailing the double-blind three-review process for academic journals. It breaks down the complete workflow—from initial submission and editor screening to external review, multiple revision rounds, and final acceptance. The guide provides authors with actionable advice on preparing for each stage, managing expectations, and avoiding common procedural pitfalls.

This guide provides detailed instructions on designing high-quality visual exhibits for academic literature reviews, such as the Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc). It covers three primary exhibit types: 'Who-found-what' summary tables, conceptual framework figures, and meta-evidence plots. The focus is on synthesizing findings across multiple studies and structuring arguments, rather than presenting new primary estimates or raw data.

A comprehensive guide for drafting or polishing long-form, integrative manuscripts for cognitive psychology journals. It teaches authors how to weave multiple experiments and formal models into a single, continuous theoretical argument, ensuring rigorous structure, narrative flow, and adherence to APA-style statistical reporting.

A comprehensive guide to passing the rigorous, multi-stage peer-review process of top-tier academic journals. This skill helps authors understand the double-anonymized screening criteria, from initial editorial fit checks (quantitative/theory-testing) to satisfying multiple independent expert reviewers. Use this to stress-test your manuscript's methodology, measurement validity, and theoretical contribution before submission.

This guide helps structure scientific manuscripts, particularly in conservation biology, to clearly define a novel gap in the literature. It teaches how to position the work against broad conservation debates, engaging multiple disciplines (ecology, social science, policy) to demonstrate the transferability and significance of the contribution to the field.