Skill UI

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the rigorous submission process for the Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA). It ensures compliance with specific academic standards, including single-blind review format, mandatory data availability declarations (DCAS), handling of supplemental materials, and adherence to current membership and fee requirements. Use this guide before finalizing your submission to avoid administrative rejections.

This comprehensive framework guides financial researchers in structuring high-quality literature reviews for academic manuscripts. It moves beyond mere citation listing by enforcing a three-part narrative structure: tracing the global theoretical and mechanistic origins, contextualizing the discussion within local Chinese institutional settings, and precisely defining the novel contribution (the research gap). Mastering this process ensures a deep, scholarly dialogue between international theory and local empirical evidence.

This guide walks authors through the entire academic publishing lifecycle for international marketing journals. It details the editorial pipeline, from initial administrative checks and editor screening to the detailed review process, including common desk-reject triggers (e.g., single-country data, lack of equivalence evidence). It also provides strategies for productive waiting, drafting anticipated objections, and managing revision decisions.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide and checklist for targeting the Journal of Experimental Medicine (JEM). It analyzes the manuscript's fit, required mechanistic depth, expected evidence bar (e.g., in vivo models, genetic dissection), and specific formatting requirements for submissions to this highly selective immunology journal. Use this tool for venue selection and manuscript re-framing.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for researchers to pressure-test whether their public administration project is suitable for the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART). It emphasizes contributing to or testing public-management theory rather than merely presenting policy findings, helping users refine research questions and determine the most appropriate academic venue (JPART, PAR, JPAM, Governance).

A comprehensive guide for drafting or polishing academic manuscripts intended for the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART). It ensures the paper reads as a theory-driven contribution supported by rigorous evidence, adheres to OUP author-date style, and meets strict word count limitations. Focuses on structuring the abstract, introduction, and theoretical argument.

A detailed guide for researchers preparing manuscripts for public economics journals (e.g., JPubE). It outlines best practices for creating a fully auditable, reproducible research package, focusing on data-availability statements, handling restricted administrative data (like tax or health records), and adhering to journal Option C requirements.

This comprehensive guide instructs authors on creating mandatory, high-impact scientific communication artifacts for top-tier journals. It covers writing concise, mechanistic 'Highlights' (3-4 bullet points), developing an accessible, third-person eTOC blurb, and designing a single-panel Graphical Abstract. Essential for late-stage manuscript polishing and maximizing scientific impact.

A comprehensive guide for authors on how to strategically address demanding peer reviews, particularly for highly rigorous molecular biology journals. It covers triage methods (Do, Defend, Defer), prioritizing new experiments based on impact and feasibility, and structuring a point-by-point response letter that is respectful, evidence-led, and mechanistically airtight.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with deep insight into Nature Immunology's high standards. It covers everything from field-shifting scientific significance and required mechanistic evidence (e.g., in vivo models, scRNA-seq) to specific house styles, abstract structure, and optimal venue selection. Use this skill for pre-submission vetting and improving the conceptual framing of your immunology research.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine if their materials science manuscript meets the high conceptual bar set by Nature Materials. It covers expected advances (e.g., new design principles, structure-property relationships), required experimental evidence (e.g., state-of-the-art characterization, mechanistic proof), and necessary house style guidelines for cross-disciplinary readability.

This skill guides users on elevating empirical findings (raw correlations) into robust, generalizable, and theoretically grounded arguments suitable for high-impact academic journals. It teaches how to explicitly define mechanisms, scope conditions, and observable implications to transform descriptive work into conceptual, mechanistic contributions.