Skill UI

This guide provides a strategic framework for authors responding to rigorous peer reviews in high-stakes academic venues. It details how to manage both short-term rebuttals and full revision submissions, covering objection triage (misreading, evidence gaps, adaptive attacks), precise scope definitions, and the formal documentation required for ethics and methodology. Learn to structure your response to maximize acceptance probability.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major academic conference reviews (e.g., ACM IMC). It details the strategy for the two distinct review turns: the initial rebuttal and the highly structured, bounded One-Shot-Revision. Learn how to maintain double-blind anonymity, address specific action points, and defend your methodology against common reviewer concerns (e.g., validity, ethics, scope creep).

A comprehensive guide detailing the strategy for responding to major or minor revisions (R&R) in academic journals, particularly in economics. It teaches authors how to balance conflicting academic demands (identification, robustness) with policy relevance, structuring the response letter to be both academically rigorous and highly persuasive. Essential for improving publication chances.

A comprehensive guide for revising technical papers, specifically tailored for submission to top-tier robotics conferences like IROS. It teaches how to restructure narratives from 'demo-speak' to quantitative, evidence-based claims, focusing on a task-first opening, integrated system description, and mandatory figure-first presentation within strict page budgets.

This guide polishes academic prose to meet the rigorous standards of top economics and accounting journals (e.g., JAE). It ensures the writing is precise, hypothesis-driven, and structured according to positive-accounting tradition. It covers mandatory elements like structured sections (numbered), Harvard author-date referencing, and required packaging (Highlights, Keywords, JEL codes).

This guide outlines the rigorous method for developing econometrically testable hypotheses for accounting research, particularly for high-tier journals. Instead of relying on vague constructs, it teaches how to ground predictions in core economic theories like information economics, agency theory, and contracting frictions. It helps researchers build a clear mechanism by specifying the agent's optimization problem, identifying the core friction, and deriving conditional, testable predictions.

This guide provides a structured protocol for authors writing methods papers in statistics or econometrics. It teaches how to define the precise 'delta' (incremental contribution) of a new method by explicitly referencing 3-6 existing state-of-the-art techniques. It emphasizes positioning the work across both traditional econometric theory and modern machine learning/data science literature, ensuring the contribution is clearly stated against named prior methods, not as a general survey.

This router serves as a comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Development Economics (JDE). It does not replace any specialized skill but diagnoses the current stage of the research and identifies the optimal next step—whether it involves refining the contribution framing, strengthening the causal identification, structuring figures, or preparing a rebuttal letter. Use it when you are unsure how to proceed.

A comprehensive routing guide for developing and refining academic manuscripts targeting the Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA). This skill diagnoses bottlenecks at every stage—from initial topic selection and theory modeling to empirical robustness checks and rebuttal strategy—ensuring the submission meets the high general-interest standards of top-tier economics journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to cross-disciplinary journals (e.g., Economics and Geography). It details how to anticipate and pre-emptively address systematic objections from two distinct scholarly communities, ensuring the paper satisfies both rigorous quantitative methods and deep spatial theory. Use this when your work bridges two fields and needs to survive double-anonymous review.

This guide provides essential stylistic rules for writing academic manuscripts intended for interdisciplinary audiences, specifically bridging economics and geography. It helps authors structure their arguments, translate complex technical apparatus into prose, and ensure the spatial contribution is legible to both economic and geographical scholars without diluting the core findings.

This guide provides a structured methodology for translating highly technical academic papers, particularly in econometrics or macroeconomics, into plain language suitable for a broad scholarly audience (like the Journal of Economic Perspectives). It focuses on removing notation, jargon, and complex mathematical derivations, while rigorously preserving the underlying economic intuition and causal mechanism of the research.