Skill UI

A guide for pausing and asking targeted questions whenever requirements are vague, ensuring the team locks in objectives, scope, constraints, and acceptance criteria before any implementation begins.

A guide for pausing and asking targeted questions whenever requirements are vague, ensuring the team locks in objectives, scope, constraints, and acceptance criteria before any implementation begins.

This powerful skill pauses deep technical discussions to conduct a comprehensive, multi-dimensional reassessment. It analyzes conceptual drift, identifies unverified assumptions, and detects potential cognitive biases (e.g., confirmation bias, sunk cost fallacy). Use it when the conversation is becoming overly detailed, or when a strategic check-in is needed to ensure the focus remains on the core objective and the correct problem is being solved.

This agent provides a critical framework for navigating corporate environments, contrasting internal jargon and process visibility (Ding In) with objective, real-world evidence and user experience (Ding Out). It helps users move beyond subjective 'feelings' or polished reports, structuring complex tasks into verifiable components: Goal, Acceptance Criteria, Action, Evidence, and Risk. Ideal for project management, status reporting, and critical thinking in a corporate setting.

This skill generates comprehensive, structured lesson plans for any topic, audience, or setting. It provides a detailed framework including learning objectives (using Bloom's taxonomy), a timed activity sequence (hook, instruction, practice, assessment), required materials, differentiation strategies, and common misconceptions to address. Ideal for educators, corporate trainers, and curriculum developers.

This skill generates a comprehensive, structured guide for planning and facilitating any type of workshop, strategic session, or collaborative meeting. It covers the entire lifecycle, including defining clear objectives, designing detailed activities with instructions, managing group dynamics and conflicts, and ensuring concrete commitments and next steps are captured. Ideal for project managers, trainers, and team leads.

A comprehensive guide for writing and auditing scientific manuscripts according to JAMA standards. It enforces the proper structured headings (e.g., Importance, Objective, Results) and mandates the inclusion of quantitative data like effect sizes and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). This skill ensures the abstract and Key Points are concise, consistent, and highly focused on primary outcomes.

This skill refines academic manuscripts for submission to interdisciplinary family-science journals. It ensures strict adherence to modified APA style, structures the abstract (including Objective, Background, Method, etc.), eliminates bias-free language, and tightens prose to fit strict page limits. Its goal is to clearly articulate the family significance for diverse academic audiences.

This tool provides a systematic framework for formalizing complex management and business scenarios into a mathematically well-posed decision problem. It guides users through identifying the five critical elements: decision makers, decision variables, information structure, uncertainty sources, and objectives/constraints. This is essential for ensuring that subsequent models (optimization, game theory, etc.) are correctly structured and viable for rigorous research.

This comprehensive guide outlines the proactive editorial strategy for authors submitting a scholarly 'perspective' article. It teaches authors how to define and maintain the scope, anticipate critical referee questions (e.g., breadth, balance, framework), and strategically select objective reviewers to ensure the manuscript meets high academic standards.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the final submission requirements for academic journals, specifically targeting the Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) format. It ensures compliance with critical standards including abstract word limits (200 words), APA formatting, open science data deposits, ethical declarations, and objective reviewer nominations. Use this before submitting to any scholarly portal.

This skill simulates the experience of a senior judge reviewing a written legal argument, submission, or academic paper for the first time under time pressure. It provides a structured, objective assessment of clarity, structure, and persuasive force, detailing areas of confusion, perceived strengths, and unproven assumptions without suggesting revisions or improvements. Ideal for refining core legal and policy arguments.