Skill UI

This skill refines academic manuscripts for Conservation Biology, ensuring the writing is highly accessible to a broad conservation audience. It optimizes prose, structures the argument (IMRAD), adheres to strict journal style guides (citations, title formatting), and enforces required word counts, all while maintaining scientific rigor. Ideal for final drafts and pre-submission polishing.

Provides a comprehensive guide for authors responding to highly technical conference reviews, particularly focusing on the critical 'one-shot major revision response letter.' It details strategies for maintaining strict double-anonymity, structuring the rebuttal around decision-critical points (soundness, reproducibility), and creating a detailed change ledger to systematically address every minimum necessary change requested by reviewers.

This guide outlines the strategic allocation of content—such as results, methods, and limitations—into the main body, appendix, or artifact for academic submissions. The core principle is 'decision-criticality': any information a reviewer must read to accept the paper must reside in the main body, ensuring key findings are not hidden in supplementary materials or repositories.

This skill helps researchers assess whether their accounting manuscript is suitable for premier, broad-scope journals like Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR). It thoroughly evaluates the paper's contribution, methodological rigor (including archival, experimental, analytical, and field methods), structural fit, and provides critical insights on submission guidelines and potential alternative venues.

This skill acts as an expert guide for authors targeting the journal 'Contemporary Finance and Economics.' It helps authors evaluate their academic manuscripts against the journal's specific positioning, thematic preferences (e.g., finance, regional economy), submission requirements (double-blind review, citation styles, abstract rules), and common rejection pitfalls. It is essential for structuring and refining a paper before official submission.

Provides a detailed structural guide for writing high-quality literature reviews, specifically tailored for top-tier journals in Public Administration. It coaches users on transitioning from a simple 'listing' format to a critical 'dialogue' format, ensuring proper theoretical anchoring (e.g., Public Administration theory), balancing international and local literature, and clearly defining the paper's unique contribution and knowledge gaps.

A specialized tool designed to guide authors in drafting professional and structured rebuttal letters for academic journals, particularly those in Public Administration. It provides detailed templates and guidance for addressing reviewer comments, focusing specifically on strengthening theoretical frameworks and justifying methodological fits to meet high academic standards.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for refining academic manuscripts, specifically targeting the style required for Chinese Public Administration journals. It teaches users to eliminate vague policy jargon, anchor empirical arguments in theoretical frameworks, and transform descriptive case studies into evidence-linked scholarly analyses, ensuring the final work meets rigorous academic standards.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for researchers submitting manuscripts to academic journals, specifically referencing 'Chinese Public Administration' (CPA). It guides users through critical areas such as format compliance (font, spacing, numbering), ensuring author anonymity and de-identification of qualitative data, proper citation according to National Standards (GB/T 7714), adherence to research ethics (IRB), and the organization of supplementary materials. Use this guide before the final submission to ensure methodological and structural rigor.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and refining academic research topics in Public Administration. It assists users in moving from broad, vague domains to concrete, theory-grounded, and publishable research questions. The guide emphasizes theoretical positioning, defining distinct contributions, and matching the paper's nature to appropriate academic journals.

A comprehensive guide for structuring the literature review in Comparative Political Studies (CPS) papers. It teaches authors how to move beyond simply citing sources by identifying a specific, contested academic debate, framing the gap as a falsifiable claim, and naming the rival theories that the paper's evidence must adjudicate. Focuses on establishing cross-regional comparative leverage.

This guide details the rigorous academic peer review process for Comparative Political Studies (CPS). It helps authors preempt reviewer objections by detailing the desk screening criteria, the focus of anonymous peer review, and what comparativists reward or punish. Use this before submission to stress-test your manuscript and ensure your comparative contribution is robust and defensible.